Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis

被引:791
|
作者
Ginzler, EM
Dooley, MA
Aranow, C
Kim, MY
Buyon, J
Merrill, JT
Petri, M
Gilkeson, GS
Wallace, DJ
Weisman, MH
Appel, GB
机构
[1] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Div Rheumatol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Div Biostat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, Sch Med, New York, NY 10003 USA
[5] Oklahoma Med Res Fdn, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[8] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, New York, NY USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2005年 / 353卷 / 21期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa043731
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Since anecdotal series and small, prospective, controlled trials suggest that mycophenolate mofetil may be effective for treating lupus nephritis, larger trials are desirable. METHODS We conducted a 24-week randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing oral mycophenolate mofetil (initial dose, 1000 mg per day, increased to 3000 mg per day) with monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide (0.5 g per square meter of body-surface area, increased to 1.0 g per square meter) as induction therapy for active lupus nephritis. A change to the alternative regimen was allowed at 12 weeks in patients who did not have an early response. The study protocol specified adjunctive care and the use and tapering of corticosteroids. The primary end point was complete remission at 24 weeks (normalization of abnormal renal measurements and maintenance of baseline normal measurements). A secondary end point was partial remission at 24 weeks. RESULTS Of 140 patients recruited, 71 were randomly assigned to receive mycophenolate mofetil and 69 were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide. At 12 weeks, 56 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 42 receiving cyclophosphamide had satisfactory early responses. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 16 of the 71 patients (22.5 percent) receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 4 of the 69 patients receiving cyclophosphamide (5.8 percent) had complete remission, for an absolute difference of 16.7 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval, 5.6 to 27.9 percentage points; P=0.005), meeting the prespecified criteria for noninferiority and demonstrating the superiority of mycophenolate mofetil to cyclophosphamide. Partial remission occurred in 21 of the 71 patients (29.6 percent) and 17 of the 69 patients (24.6 percent), respectively (P=0.51). Three patients assigned to cyclophosphamide died, two during protocol therapy. Fewer severe infections and hospitalizations but more diarrhea occurred among those receiving mycophenolate. CONCLUSIONS In this 24-week trial, mycophenolate mofetil was more effective than intravenous cyclophosphamide in inducing remission of lupus nephritis and had a more favorable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:2219 / 2228
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis
    Alvarez, L
    Rivera, F
    Gil, CM
    del Cerro, LAJ
    Olivares, J
    [J]. NEFROLOGIA, 2002, 22 (01): : 24 - 32
  • [22] Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis
    Cross, J
    Jayne, D
    [J]. LUPUS, 2000, 9 (09) : 647 - 650
  • [23] Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis
    Ginzler, E
    Aranow, C
    [J]. LUPUS, 2005, 14 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [24] Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Gadakchi, Leyla
    Hajialilo, Mehrzad
    Nakhjavani, Mohammad-Reza
    Azar, Sima Abedi
    Kolahi, Sousan
    Gojazadeh, Morteza
    Ebrahimi, Ali-asghar
    Mahdavi, Aida Malek
    Noshad, Hamid
    Khabbazi, Alireza
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 12 (05) : 288 - 292
  • [25] Is mycophenolate mofetil superior to pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis in Egyptian patients?
    Eid M. El-Shafey
    Said H. Abdou
    Mohamed M. Shareef
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2010, 14 : 214 - 221
  • [26] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide
    Christian Burchardi
    Detlef Schlöndorff
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2006, 2 : 314 - 315
  • [27] Is mycophenolate mofetil superior to pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis in Egyptian patients?
    El-Shafey, Eid M.
    Abdou, Said H.
    Shareef, Mohamed M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 14 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [28] Can mycophenolate mofetil substitute cyclophosphamide treatment of pediatric lupus nephritis?
    Paredes, Ana
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 22 (08) : 1077 - 1082
  • [29] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil is superior to cyclophosphamide
    Jennifer R Elliott
    Susan Manzi
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, 2006, 2 : 354 - 355
  • [30] Can mycophenolate mofetil substitute cyclophosphamide treatment of pediatric lupus nephritis?
    Ana Paredes
    [J]. Pediatric Nephrology, 2007, 22 : 1077 - 1082