Intraday and interday distribution of stock returns and their asymmetric conditional volatility: Firm-level evidence

被引:3
|
作者
Balaban, Ercan [1 ]
Ozgen, Tolga [2 ]
Karidis, Socrates [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bedfordshire, Business Sch, Luton LU1 3JU, Beds, England
[2] Craig Associates, Edinburgh EH3 9BW, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Coventry Univ London, Dept Accounting Finance & Energy, London E1 7JF, England
关键词
Statistical distributions of stock returns and volatility; Intraday effects; Interday effects; Risk-return relationship; Asymmetric time varying volatility; OF-THE-WEEK; CALENDAR ANOMALIES; DAILY SEASONALITY; MARKETS; PATTERNS; INFORMATION; INVESTOR; PRICES; CRISIS; NEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.116
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This paper is a pioneering effort to jointly analyze the intraday and interday distribution of stock returns and their asymmetric time varying volatility using firm level data from an emerging stock market, namely, the Bourse Istanbul. The joint intraday and interday distribution analysis is based on the two trading sessions with a two-hour lunch break and the trading days of week. The asymmetric time varying volatility is based on the Threshold Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity-in-Mean [TGARCH(1,1)-M] model with systematic risk entering the return generating process. This is a unique framework to simultaneously test (i) the weak-form informational efficiency, (ii) the conditional total risk-return relationship and the systematic risk effects, and (iii) volatility persistence and asymmetry in volatility. The firm level intraday data sets are used for the period 1995 to 2015. Firstly, a strong result can be pronounced for a positive return effect for the second trading session of Thursdays followed by the second session of Fridays. The first session of Wednesdays is more associated with a stock price decline. The volatility is the highest in the second session of Mondays. Although the second session of Thursdays sees a volatility increase referring to a positive risk-return relationship, Fridays do not have any significant volatility increase. This can be seen as a true anomaly where we could observe higher returns with lower volatility. Secondly, it can be concluded that only the systematic risk is priced for the great majority of the selected firms. In addition, we cannot observe a significant asymmetry in the volatility in most cases. Finally, it is found that the financial companies have a significantly higher systematic risk than the industrial companies. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 915
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Firm-Level Cybersecurity Risk and Idiosyncratic Volatility
    Alan, Nazli Sila
    Karagozoglu, Ahmet K.
    Zhou, Tianpeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (09): : 110 - 140
  • [42] Aggregate and Firm-level Volatility in the Japanese Economy
    Young Gak Kim
    Hyeog Ug Kwon
    [J]. The Japanese Economic Review, 2017, 68 : 158 - 172
  • [43] Growth volatility and size: A firm-level study
    Calvino, Flavio
    Criscuolo, Chiara
    Menon, Carlo
    Secchi, Angelo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2018, 90 : 390 - 407
  • [44] Exports, investment and firm-level sales volatility
    Alejandro Riaño
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2011, 147 : 643 - 663
  • [45] Exports, investment and firm-level sales volatility
    Riano, Alejandro
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2011, 147 (04) : 643 - 663
  • [46] Aggregate and Firm-level Volatility in the Japanese Economy
    Kim, Young Gak
    Kwon, Hyeog Ug
    [J]. JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 68 (02) : 158 - 172
  • [47] Importing, exporting, and firm-level employment volatility
    Kurz, Christopher
    Senses, Mine Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 98 : 160 - 175
  • [48] IS FIRM-LEVEL VOLATILITY INCREASING IN USA FIRMS?
    Gui, Hefa
    Li, Yue
    Wu, Weixing
    Xu, Rong
    [J]. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2009, (94): : 231 - 240
  • [49] Firm-level productivity and stock return: New evidence from China
    Tang, Ning
    Gao, Mengyao
    Zhou, Yixun
    Zhou, Fangzhao
    Zhu, Jichen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [50] Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Evidence
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Zhang, Liandong
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 33 (01) : 412 - 441