Comparative assessment of surface roughness produced by hard machining with mixed ceramic tools including 2D and 3D analysis

被引:48
|
作者
Grzesik, W [1 ]
Wanat, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Opole, Dept Mfg Engn & Prod Automat, PL-45271 Opole, Poland
关键词
hard machining; mixed ceramic tools; surface roughness; surface structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.080
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper provides a new comprehensive analysis of part surface finish in continuous dry turning of a hardened construction steel when using mixed alumina cutting tools. Consequently, the surface profiles (2D arragement) and surface microstereometries (3D arragement) generated during different hard part turning operations on a 40H low chromium alloy steel (equivalent to AISI 5140 or DIN 41Cr4), heat treated to the hardness of about 60 HRC, were evaluated. As a result, this paper aggregates the multi-parameters characterization of the surface roughness with the machined surface structure obtained at the three selected feed rates and constant cutting speed of 100 m/min. Results show that hard turning with mixed alumina tools produces specific surface profiles and microstructures, although the Ra roughness values of about 0.25 mu m can be comparable to those produced by finish grinding. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative assessment of two ceramic cutting tools on surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 steel: including 2D and 3D surface topography
    Khellaf, A.
    Aouici, H.
    Smaiah, S.
    Boutabba, S.
    Yallese, M. A.
    Elbah, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 89 (1-4): : 333 - 354
  • [3] Comparative assessment of two ceramic cutting tools on surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 steel: including 2D and 3D surface topography
    A. Khellaf
    H. Aouici
    S. Smaiah
    S. Boutabba
    M. A. Yallese
    M. Elbah
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 89 : 333 - 354
  • [4] A Critical Analysis of Red Ceramic Blocks Roughness Estimation by 2D and 3D Methods
    Arnold, Daiana Cristina Metz
    de Oliveira, Valeria Costa
    Kazmierczak, Claudio de Souza
    Tonietto, Leandro
    Menegotto, Camila Werner
    Gonzaga, Luiz
    Andre da Costa, Cristiano
    Veronez, Mauricio Roberto
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [5] SURFACE TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF A JOINT SAMPLE BY 2D AND 3D SURFACE ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS
    Manas, K.
    Hnidka, J.
    Triska, V
    [J]. ENGINEERING MECHANICS 2019, 2019, 25 : 247 - 250
  • [6] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [7] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Earl Magsipoc
    Qi Zhao
    Giovanni Grasselli
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1495 - 1519
  • [8] Comparative 2D and 3D analysis of a resin composite surface.
    Waplington, M
    Blunt, L
    Lumley, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2248 - 2248
  • [9] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Magsipoc, Earl
    Zhao, Qi
    Grasselli, Giovanni
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1495 - 1519
  • [10] 3D versus 2D finite element simulation of the effect of surface roughness on nanoindentation of hard coatings
    Walter, C.
    Mitterer, C.
    [J]. SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 203 (20-21): : 3286 - 3290