The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China's trade with the Belt and Road countries

被引:80
|
作者
Liu, Ailan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Cuicui [3 ]
Wang, Zhixuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yingbin Rd 688, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Normal Univ, China Africa Int Business Sch, Yingbin Rd 688, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Sch Innovat & Entrepreneurship, 72 Binhai Rd, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Natl Accounting Inst, Res Ctr Belt & Rd Financial & Econ Dev, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cultural distance; Institutional distance; Gravity model; The Belt and road; Poisson generalized estimating equations; GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2018.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cultural distance and institutional distance have been playing increasingly significant roles in international trade. Recently, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) proposed by China has drawn worldwide attention. This paper examines the roles of cultural distance and institutional distance in China's trade relationship with the Belt and Road (B&R) countries. We estimate the extended gravity model using bilateral trade data at product-level during 2002-2016 between China and 99 trading partners, 38 of which are along the Belt and Road. Using Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEE) econometric methods, we find that firstly, cultural distance and institutional distance inhibit China's bilateral trade with the Belt and Road countries. Secondly, China's bilateral trade with the B&R countries is more sensitive to the change of cultural distance than institutional distance by comparing their beta coefficients. Thirdly, compared to Asian countries on the Belt and Road, bilateral trade flows between China and European countries show less sensitivity to changes in cultural distance, except China's imports from its trading partners. While the trade effects of institutional distance show no difference between China's trade with European countries and Asian countries. Lastly, the announcement of BRI does reduce trade-inhibiting effect of cultural distance on China's trade with the Belt and Road countries, while increase China's exports sensitivity to institutional distance. This study finally suggests relevant cultural exchange driven by the BRI eventually assisting unimpeded trade and deepening the cooperation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An inquiry into the effect of trade facilitation on China's digital product exports to countries along the "Belt and Road"
    Wang, Shubai
    Zhu, Yaqing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 93 : 1246 - 1259
  • [32] Deepening of Free Trade Agreements and International Trade: Evidence from China
    Wang, Jun
    Liao, Chengjuan
    Xiong, Jie
    Wang, Chengbo
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (06) : 1960 - 1975
  • [33] Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries
    Xia, Wenjun
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Song, Chao
    Perez-Carrera, Alejo
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 262
  • [34] Trade impacts of China's Belt and Road Initiative: From resource and environmental perspectives
    Tian, Xu
    Hu, Yunyi
    Yin, Haitao
    Geng, Yong
    Bleischwitz, Raimund
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 150
  • [35] Relationship of Trade and China's Logistics Capability under "the Belt and Road"
    Liu, Mingze
    Shi, Xianliang
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, INFORMATICS AND SERVICE SCIENCES (LISS' 2016), 2016,
  • [36] Does ICT promote digitizable product trade? - Evidence from Chinese exports to the 'Belt and Road' countries
    Wang, Aihua
    Lia, Jun
    Wang, Yanzhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 31 (06): : 953 - 965
  • [37] The trade potential of grain crops in the countries along the Belt and Road: evidence from a stochastic frontier model
    Miao, Ting
    Pastpipatkul, Pathairat
    Liu, Xinhua
    Liu, Jianxu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [38] Structural Evolution and Sustainability of Agricultural Trade between China and Countries along the "Belt and Road"
    Zhou, Lunzheng
    Tong, Guangji
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [39] China and Countries along the "Belt and Road": Agricultural Trade Volatility Decomposition and Food Security
    Zhou, Lunzheng
    Tong, Guangji
    Qi, Jiaguo
    He, Lu
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [40] GVC trade and business cycle synchronization between China and belt-road countries
    Yu, Chunjiao
    Zhao, Jiaqi
    Cheng, Shixiong
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 126