The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China's trade with the Belt and Road countries

被引:80
|
作者
Liu, Ailan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Cuicui [3 ]
Wang, Zhixuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yingbin Rd 688, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Normal Univ, China Africa Int Business Sch, Yingbin Rd 688, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Sch Innovat & Entrepreneurship, 72 Binhai Rd, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Natl Accounting Inst, Res Ctr Belt & Rd Financial & Econ Dev, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cultural distance; Institutional distance; Gravity model; The Belt and road; Poisson generalized estimating equations; GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2018.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cultural distance and institutional distance have been playing increasingly significant roles in international trade. Recently, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) proposed by China has drawn worldwide attention. This paper examines the roles of cultural distance and institutional distance in China's trade relationship with the Belt and Road (B&R) countries. We estimate the extended gravity model using bilateral trade data at product-level during 2002-2016 between China and 99 trading partners, 38 of which are along the Belt and Road. Using Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEE) econometric methods, we find that firstly, cultural distance and institutional distance inhibit China's bilateral trade with the Belt and Road countries. Secondly, China's bilateral trade with the B&R countries is more sensitive to the change of cultural distance than institutional distance by comparing their beta coefficients. Thirdly, compared to Asian countries on the Belt and Road, bilateral trade flows between China and European countries show less sensitivity to changes in cultural distance, except China's imports from its trading partners. While the trade effects of institutional distance show no difference between China's trade with European countries and Asian countries. Lastly, the announcement of BRI does reduce trade-inhibiting effect of cultural distance on China's trade with the Belt and Road countries, while increase China's exports sensitivity to institutional distance. This study finally suggests relevant cultural exchange driven by the BRI eventually assisting unimpeded trade and deepening the cooperation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The economic and environmental effects of the Belt and Road Countries’ demand on China in the international trade
    Wang, Lianfen
    Liang, Junyi
    Chen, Xiangjie
    Zhou, Saiqun
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2023, 43 (05): : 1249 - 1266
  • [2] Does international trade improve carbon productivity? Evidence from countries along the Belt and Road
    Xu, Runong
    Chen, Yufeng
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (30) : 42827 - 42839
  • [3] Greening the Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence from emergy evaluation of China's provincial trade with ASEAN countries
    Tian, Xu
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Chen, Wei
    Geng, Yong
    Pan, Haozhi
    Liu, Zuoxi
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 4 (02): : 379 - 393
  • [4] Trade Openness and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries
    Sun, Huaping
    Clottey, Samuel Attuquaye
    Geng, Yong
    Fang, Kai
    Amissah, Joshua Clifford Kofi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [5] Agricultural trade shocks and carbon leakage: Evidence from China's trade shocks to the Belt & Road economies
    Hu, Jiangfeng
    Wang, Zhao
    Huang, Qinghua
    Hu, Mengjia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 90
  • [6] China trade with belt and road countries: the role and impact of institutions
    Bakhsh, Satar
    Yin, He
    Shabir, Mohsin
    Ali, Kishwar
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (01) : 29 - 48
  • [7] The Economic and Trade Cooperation of China with Countries along the Belt and Road
    Liu Zhongyun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER AND SOCIETY, 2016, 37 : 590 - 593
  • [8] The Belt and Road Initiative and Cultural Bias in Bilateral Trade with China
    Kapma, Ryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2023, 57 (01) : 172 - 191
  • [9] The impact of institutional distance on sustainable investment: evidence from China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Pathiranage, Heshan Sameera Kankanam
    Xiao, Huilin
    Li, Weifeng
    [J]. NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 11 (04) : 485 - 505
  • [10] China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment and the Margins of Trade: Empirical Evidence from "One Belt, One Road" Countries
    Lu Yue
    Lu Yunlong
    Zeng Ka
    Li Yadong
    [J]. CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (01) : 129 - 151