Contagion risk in global banking sector

被引:52
|
作者
Daly, Kevin [1 ]
Batten, Jonathan A. [2 ]
Mishra, Anil V. [3 ]
Choudhury, Tonmoy [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Econ & Finance, Sch Business, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Business Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Business, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Churchlands, WA, Australia
关键词
Global systemically important banks (GSIBs); Extreme value theory (EVT); Distance to default (DD); Distance to insolvency (DI); Distance to capital (DC); Logistic regression model; PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION; DISTANCE-TO-DEFAULT; FINANCIAL CRISIS; CORPORATE-DEBT; SYSTEMIC RISK; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; DYNAMICS; MARKETS; EU;
D O I
10.1016/j.intfin.2019.101136
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates contagion risk for the global banking environment using three different distance to risk measures (distance to default, distance to capital, and distance to insolvency). The timeframe for this research covers a period that is characterized by substantial financial innovation in regards to regulatory, monetary and technological change experienced in the banking environment. Our hypothesis is that volatility in the banking structure of a particular country upsurges the prospect of financial volatility in another. We model extreme shocks for banks by replicating four separate conditions of financial stress. We compute the probability of these states moving from one country's banking system to another by employing multinomial logistic model. In total, we investigate the possibility of extreme event in one country's banking system as a function of extreme events in other countries banking systems throughout our sample period. Our sample consists of ninety-one banks from twenty countries including all G8 and BRICS countries in operation from 6th January 2006 up to 31st December 2015. Overall, we find evidence of strong correlations between countries' banking systems especially between those of UK and US. Our findings suggest the need for greater regulatory control over banks operating as global systemically important banks (GSIBs). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Assessment of Systemic Risk in the Japanese Banking Sector
    Kanno, Masayasu
    [J]. GLOBAL CREDIT REVIEW, 2014, 4 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [42] Credit risk cyclicality in Serbian banking sector
    Kanazir, Svetlana Drljaca
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (22) : 2505 - 2520
  • [43] Legal risk management in the Polish banking sector
    Modras, Agnieszka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2023, 18 (04): : 103 - 125
  • [44] Transparency and the disclosure of risk information in the banking sector
    Linsley, Philip
    Shrives, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE, 2005, 13 (03) : 205 - +
  • [45] Banking sector contingent liabilities and sovereign risk
    Arslanalp, Serkan
    Liao, Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2014, 29 : 316 - 330
  • [46] Financial intermediation and endogenous risk in the banking sector
    Broll, Udo
    Eckwert, Bernhard
    Eickhoff, Andreas
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (05) : 1618 - 1622
  • [47] EXPOSURE TO THE ESG RISK OF THE POLISH BANKING SECTOR
    Pyka, Irena
    Nocon, Aleksandra
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 88 (01): : 14 - 14
  • [48] Measurement of Systemic Risk in the Colombian Banking Sector
    Rivera-Escobar, Orlando
    Escobar, John Willmer
    Manotas, Diego Fernando
    [J]. RISKS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [49] The impact of the expansion of liabilities at risk in the banking sector
    Krajicek, Jan
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS: 7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-III, 2014, : 398 - 403
  • [50] Banking Sector and Sovereign Risk in Euroepan Union
    Bruha, Jan
    Kocenda, Evzen
    [J]. POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2018, 66 (03) : 366 - 383