Propensity score stratification for observational comparison of repeated binary outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Leon, Andrew C. [1 ]
Hedeker, Donald [2 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
Bias reduction; Propensity adjustment; Stratification; Treatment effectiveness; ADJUSTMENT; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A two-stage longitudinal propensity adjustment is described for bias reduction in treatment effectiveness estimates in observational studies. The initial stage characterizes those who receive various ordinal doses of treatment in a model of time-varying propensity for treatment intensity. The second stage incorporates the propensity adjustment in longitudinal treatment effectiveness analyses of a binary outcome that are stratified by propensity quantile. Mantel-Haenszel pooled parameter estimates are then calculated as weighted means of quantile-specific estimates. A simulation study compares four approaches to quantile stratification and shows that the quintile stratification reduces more bias than when fewer strata are used with longitudinal data. Statistical power, type I error and coverage are also evaluated. A longitudinal, observational study of antidepressant effectiveness illustrates the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 498
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF COVARIATE BALANCE AMONG PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING VERSUS PROPENSITY SCORE WEIGHTING AND STRATIFICATION IN OBSERVATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE RESEARCH
    Wei, D.
    Vashisht, A.
    Cafri, G.
    Johnston, S.
    Wood, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S7 - S7
  • [2] The number of strata in propensity score stratification for a binary outcome
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    Thielmann, Matthias
    Ruxton, Graeme D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 14 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [3] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCE AND PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS IN REGRESSIONS WITH BINARY OUTCOMES
    Cao, Z.
    Margolis, J.
    Mark, T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A22 - A22
  • [4] A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests
    He, Hua
    McDermott, Michael P.
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2012, 13 (01) : 32 - 47
  • [5] Propensity Score Matching in Observational Research
    Schober, Patrick
    Vetter, Thomas R.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (06): : 1616 - 1617
  • [6] Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments
    Brown, Derek W.
    Greene, Thomas J.
    Swartz, Michael D.
    Wilkinson, Anna, V
    DeSantis, Stacia M.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (05) : 1189 - 1203
  • [7] Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score
    Austin, Peter C.
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (06) : 2505 - 2525
  • [8] Comparison of clustering algorithms on generalized propensity score in observational studies: a simulation study
    Tu, Chunhao
    Jiao, Shuo
    Koh, Woon Yuen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2013, 83 (12) : 2206 - 2218
  • [9] Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure
    Donna L. Coffman
    Jiangxiu Zhou
    Xizhen Cai
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [10] Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure
    Coffman, Donna L.
    Zhou, Jiangxiu
    Cai, Xizhen
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01) : 168