Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments

被引:5
|
作者
Brown, Derek W. [1 ,2 ]
Greene, Thomas J. [3 ]
Swartz, Michael D. [4 ]
Wilkinson, Anna, V [5 ]
DeSantis, Stacia M. [4 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Integrat Tumor Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Div Canc Prevent, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, Div Biostat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
causal inference; continuous treatment; observational study; propensity score; smoking initiation; MULTIPLE TREATMENTS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; SUBCLASSIFICATION; EXPOSURE; ESTIMATORS; ADJUSTMENT; REGRESSION; TUTORIAL; BALANCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8835
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Continuous treatments propensity scoring remains understudied as the majority of methods are focused on the binary treatment setting. Current propensity score methods for continuous treatments typically rely on weighting in order to produce causal estimates. It has been shown that in some continuous treatment settings, weighting methods can result in worse covariate balance than had no adjustments been made to the data. Furthermore, weighting is not always stable, and resultant estimates may be unreliable due to extreme weights. These issues motivate the current development of novel propensity score stratification techniques to be used with continuous treatments. Specifically, the generalized propensity score cumulative distribution function (GPS-CDF) and the nonparametric GPS-CDF approaches are introduced. Empirical CDFs are used to stratify subjects based on pretreatment confounders in order to produce causal estimates. A detailed simulation study shows superiority of these new stratification methods based on the empirical CDF, when compared with standard weighting techniques. The proposed methods are applied to the "Mexican-American Tobacco use in Children" study to determine the causal relationship between continuous exposure to smoking imagery in movies, and smoking behavior among Mexican-American adolescents. These promising results provide investigators with new options for implementing continuous treatment propensity scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1203
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing treatments via the propensity score: stratification or modeling?
    Myers, Jessica A.
    Louis, Thomas A.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12 (01) : 29 - 43
  • [2] Comparing treatments via the propensity score: stratification or modeling?
    Jessica A. Myers
    Thomas A. Louis
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2012, 12 (1) : 29 - 43
  • [3] Direct and indirect effects of continuous treatments based on generalized propensity score weighting
    Huber, Martin
    Hsu, Yu-Chin
    Lee, Ying-Ying
    Lettry, Layal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2020, 35 (07) : 814 - 840
  • [4] Propensity Score Methods
    Rubin, Donald B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 149 (01) : 7 - 9
  • [5] Propensity Score Methods: Setting the Score Straight
    Mayo, Skye C.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 146 (07) : 887 - 888
  • [6] Propensity score matching versus propensity score fine stratification and coarsened exact matching in claims data
    Ripollone, John E.
    Huybrechts, Krista F.
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Ferguson, Ryan E.
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 24 - 24
  • [7] The number of strata in propensity score stratification for a binary outcome
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    Thielmann, Matthias
    Ruxton, Graeme D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 14 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [8] Built environment and travel behavior: Validation and application of a continuous-treatment propensity score stratification method
    Parady, Giancarlos Troncoso
    Takami, Kiyoshi
    Harata, Noboru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2017, 10 (01) : 763 - 788
  • [9] PERFORMANCE OF TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE BASED ON STRATIFICATION BY A MULTIVARIATE CONFOUNDER SCORE OR BY A PROPENSITY SCORE
    COOK, EF
    GOLDMAN, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (04) : 317 - 324
  • [10] Propensity Score Methods: Setting the Score Straight reply
    Hemmila, Mark Richard
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 146 (07) : 888 - 889