Socio-Economic Benefits Of Telecentre Implementation In Peninsular Malaysia

被引:0
|
作者
Zulkhairi, M. D. [1 ]
Iadah, Nor Y. [1 ]
Huda, I [1 ]
Khairudin, Mohd K. [1 ]
Zahurin, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, UUM Coll Arts & Sci, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia
来源
关键词
Rural ICT Development; Bridging the Digital Divide;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper is based on a research study to assess the socioeconomic benefits of telecentre implementation throughout Peninsular Malaysia Telecentres are public access ICT facility that provide opportunities for communities to gain knowledge and skills in ICT particularly to address the issue of bridging the digital divide. Currently there are 1945 telecentres in Malaysia and this is expected to increase under the ninth Malaysia Plan with the recent announcement by the Government to build one telecentre in each mukim. With the proliferation of telecentre implementation it is timely to determine its potential contribution to the socio-economic development. For this, a survey was conducted involving 132 TCs drawn from a population comprising TCs implemented by state governments, NGOs, and private sectors. Result of the study shows that the highest social benefit of using TCs is education. In terms of economics, TCs have provided the community with more opportunity to improve their standard of living through access information on job opportunities. Evidence from the data also showed that community participation is necessary and crucial for the TCs to succeed.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 376
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Socio-economic mechanisms of implementation of a region's labor potential
    Kozlova, O. A.
    Kuz'min, A. I.
    Shaymardanov, N. Z.
    [J]. EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2012, 2 : 208 - 218
  • [42] THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE REGION IN TERMS OF INNOVATION DYNAMICS
    Ishchenko-Padukova, O. A.
    Movchan, I., V
    [J]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2014, 12 (02): : 183 - 186
  • [43] Socio-economic diagnosis before implementation: Considering the strategies of the actors
    Ahmadi, N
    Marcon, S
    Kassougue, M
    Bozza, JL
    [J]. PLANNING AND USE OF LOWLANDS IN MALI: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR MALI AND SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE WEST AFRICAN SAVANNA, 1998, : 243 - 251
  • [44] SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT MANAGEMENT - PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS
    LEISTRITZ, FL
    HALSTEAD, JM
    CHASE, RA
    MURDOCK, SH
    [J]. MINERALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 4 (04): : 141 - 150
  • [45] Socio-Economic Inequalities in Health: Socio-Economic Status as a Determinant of Health
    Dzambazovic, Roman
    Gerbery, Daniel
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA, 2014, 46 (02): : 194 - 219
  • [46] ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF BYPASSES OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
    Cetkovic, Jasmina
    Ivanovic, Biljana
    Vujadinovic, Radoje
    Zarkovic, Milos
    Grujic, Marija
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2023, 18 (04): : 117 - 144
  • [47] Energy and and socio-economic benefits from the development of wave energy in Greece
    Lavidas, George
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 132 : 1290 - 1300
  • [48] The benefits of water fluoridation across areas of differing socio-economic status
    Armfield J.M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2008, 53 (02) : 180 - 183
  • [49] Socio-Economic Benefits of Colophospermum mopane in a Changing Climate in Northern Namibia
    Nikodemus, Andreas
    Abdollahnejad, Azadeh
    Kapuka, Alpo
    Panagiotidis, Dimitrios
    Hajek, Miroslav
    [J]. FORESTS, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [50] STATE BENEFITS (OUTSIDE SOCIAL-SECURITY) TO SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS
    VANREGEMORTER, D
    [J]. CAHIERS ECONOMIQUES DE BRUXELLES, 1982, (96): : 561 - 567