SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING IN COARSE STRUCTURAL NESTED MEAN MODELS

被引:16
|
作者
Yang, Shu [1 ]
Lok, Judith J. [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Censoring; confounding by indication; estimating equations; HIV/AIDS research; non-ignorable; sequential randomization; MISSING DATA; NONCOMPLIANCE; MORTALITY; INFECTION; INFERENCE; THERAPY; IMPACT; TRIALS; TIME; BIAS;
D O I
10.5705/ss.202016.0133
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Coarse Structural Nested Mean Models (SNMMs, Robins (2000)) and G-estimation can be used to estimate the causal effect of a time-varying treatment from longitudinal observational studies. However, they rely on an untestable assumption of no unmeasured confounding. In the presence of unmeasured confounders, the unobserved potential outcomes are not missing at random, and standard G-estimation leads to biased effect estimates. To remedy this, we investigate the sensitivity of G-estimators of coarse SNMMs to unmeasured confounding, assuming a nonidentifiable bias function which quantifies the impact of unmeasured confounding on the average potential outcome. We present adjusted G-estimators of coarse SNMM parameters and prove their consistency, under the bias modeling for unmeasured confounding. We present a sensitivity analysis for the effect of the ART initiation time on the mean CD4 count at year 2 after infection in HIV-positive patients, based on the prospective Acute and Early Disease Research Program.
引用
收藏
页码:1703 / 1723
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding for the Causal Risk Ratio by Applying Marginal Structural Models
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2010, 39 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [2] Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding
    Bonvini, Matteo
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 117 (539) : 1540 - 1550
  • [3] Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding of Attributable Fraction
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 175 - 176
  • [4] Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    Chen, Jinbo
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (22) : 2552 - 2564
  • [5] Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model
    Ole Klungsøyr
    Joe Sexton
    Inger Sandanger
    Jan F. Nygård
    [J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 2009, 15 : 278 - 294
  • [6] Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model
    Klungsoyr, Ole
    Sexton, Joe
    Sandanger, Inger
    Nygard, Jan F.
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2009, 15 (02) : 278 - 294
  • [7] Bayesian sensitivity analysis to unmeasured confounding for misclassified data
    Zhou, Qi
    Chin, Yoo-Mi
    Stamey, James D.
    Song, Joon Jin
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 104 (04) : 577 - 596
  • [8] Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies
    McCandless, Lawrence C.
    Gustafson, Paul
    Levy, Adrian
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (11) : 2331 - 2347
  • [9] Simple yet sharp sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
    Pena, Jose M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2022, 10 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses
    Mathur, Maya B.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (529) : 163 - 172