Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial Comparing Haloperidol Combined With Conventional Therapy to Conventional Therapy Alone in Patients With Symptomatic Gastroparesis

被引:28
|
作者
Roldan, Carlos J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chambers, Kimberly A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Paniagua, Linda [5 ]
Patel, Sonali [6 ,7 ]
Cardenas-Turanzas, Marylou [2 ]
Chathampally, Yashwant [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pain Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Memorial Hermann Texas Med Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Lyndon B Johnson Gen Hosp, Houston, TX 77026 USA
[5] Valley Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Brownsville, TX USA
[6] Methodist Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 6535 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Conroe Reg Med Ctr, Conroe, TX USA
关键词
ABDOMINAL-PAIN; NAUSEA; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13245
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Gastroparesis is a debilitating condition that causes nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Management includes analgesics and antiemetics, but symptoms are often refractory. Haloperidol has been utilized in the palliative care setting for similar symptoms. The study objective was to determine whether haloperidol as an adjunct to conventional therapy would improve symptoms in gastroparesis patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Study Design and Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adult ED patients with acute exacerbation of previously diagnosed gastroparesis. The treatment group received 5 mg of haloperidol plus conventional therapy (determined by the treating physician). The control group received a placebo plus conventional therapy. The severity of each subject's abdominal pain and nausea were assessed before intervention and every 15 minutes thereafter for 1 hour using a 10-point scale for pain and a 5-point scale for nausea. Primary outcomes were decreased pain and nausea 1 hour after treatment. Results: Of the 33 study patients, 15 were randomized to receive haloperidol. Before treatment, the mean intensity of pain was 8.5 in the haloperidol group and 8.28 in the placebo group; mean pretreatment nausea scores were 4.53 and 4.11, respectively. One hour after therapy, the mean pain and nausea scores in the haloperidol group were 3.13 and 1.83 compared to 7.17 and 3.39 in the placebo group. The reduction in mean pain intensity therapy was 5.37 in the haloperidol group (p <= 0.001) compared to 1.11 in the placebo group (p = 0.11). The reduction in mean nausea score was 2.70 in the haloperidol group (p <= 0.001) and 0.72 in the placebo group (p = 0.05). Therefore, the reductions in symptom scores were statistically significant in the haloperidol group but not in the placebo group. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Haloperidol as an adjunctive therapy is superior to placebo for acute gastroparesis symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1314
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Combined Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Therapy as Compared With Simvastatin Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Ruggenenti, Piero
    Cattaneo, Dario
    Rota, Stefano
    Iliev, Ilian
    Parvanova, Aneliya
    Diadei, Olimpia
    Ene-Iordache, Bogdan
    Ferrari, Silvia
    Bossi, Antonio C.
    Trevisan, Roberto
    Belviso, Antonio
    Remuzzi, Giuseppe
    DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (09) : 1954 - 1956
  • [42] Lamotrigine therapy for autistic disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Belsito, KM
    Law, PA
    Kirk, KS
    Landa, RJ
    Zimmerman, AW
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2001, 31 (02) : 175 - 181
  • [43] Lamotrigine Therapy for Autistic Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Karin M. Belsito
    Paul A. Law
    Karen S. Kirk
    Rebecca J. Landa
    Andrew W. Zimmerman
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2001, 31 : 175 - 181
  • [44] Miconazole as adjuvant therapy for oral lichen planus: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Lodi, G.
    Tarozzi, M.
    Sardella, A.
    Demarosi, F.
    Canegallo, L.
    Di Benedetto, D.
    Carrassi, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 156 (06) : 1336 - 1341
  • [45] Occupational Therapy Home Programs for Cerebral Palsy: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Novak, Iona
    Cusick, Anne
    Lannin, Natasha
    PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (04) : E606 - E614
  • [46] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
    Kapur, B
    Hackman, R
    Selby, P
    Klein, J
    Koren, G
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2001, 62 (04): : 274 - 278
  • [47] Amantadine therapy for chronic hepatitis C: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial
    Smith, JP
    Riley, TR
    Devenyi, A
    Bingaman, S
    Kunselman, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 122 (04) : A627 - A627
  • [48] QUALITY OF LIFE ON ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY - A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CAPTOPRIL AND ATENOLOL
    FLETCHER, AE
    BULPITT, CJ
    HAWKINS, CM
    HAVINGA, TK
    TENBERGE, BS
    MAY, JF
    SCHUURMAN, FH
    VANDERVEUR, E
    WESSELING, H
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (05) : 463 - 466
  • [49] Heliox Therapy in Bronchiolitis: Phase III Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chowdhury, Mina M.
    McKenzie, Sheila A.
    Pearson, Christopher C.
    Carr, Siobhan
    Pao, Caroline
    Shah, Arvind R.
    Reus, Elizabeth
    Eliahoo, Joseph
    Gordon, Fabiana
    Bland, Hubert
    Habibi, Parviz
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (04) : 661 - 669
  • [50] Baclofen as an adjuvant therapy for autism: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Seyedeh-Mahsa Mahdavinasab
    Amene Saghazadeh
    Nogol Motamed-Gorji
    Salar Vaseghi
    Mohammad-Reza Mohammadi
    Rosa Alichani
    Shahin Akhondzadeh
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019, 28 : 1619 - 1628