Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma

被引:61
|
作者
Ficarra, V
Guillè, F
Schips, L
de la Taille, A
Galetti, TP
Tostain, J
Cindolo, L
Novara, G
Zigeuner, R
Bratti, E
Li, GR
Altieri, V
Abbou, CC
Zanolla, L
Artibani, W
Patard, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Urol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Rennes, Dept Urol, Rennes, France
[3] Graz Univ, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[4] CHU Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Urol, Padua, Italy
[6] CHU St Etienne, Dept Urol, St Etienne, France
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Urol, Naples, Italy
[8] Univ Verona, Dept Cardiol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
localized renal cell carcinoma; TNM classification system; nephron-sparing surgery; radial nephrectomy; partial nephrectomy; martingale residuals analysis;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21465
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The current study defined an optimal tumor size breakpoint to stratify localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into groups with significantly different cancer-related outcomes and proposed a revision of the TNM classification system. METHODS. The authors analyzed the data from 1138 patients who had undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for localized RCC at 7 European urologic centers. The optimal pathologic size breakpoint was calculated using the martingale residuals from a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS. The mean follow-up time was 87 months. The scatterplot of tumor size versus expected risk of death per patient suggested that an interval of 5-6 cm was appropriate. A total of 720 (63.3%) and 418 (36.7%) patients had tumors measuring <= 5.5-cm and tumors measuring > 5.5-cm, respectively. Significant cancer-specific survival differences between the two groups of patients were reported in the series by all the centers participating in the study. On univariate analysis, the other variables found to be associated with cancer-specific survival were the patient's age, symptomatic tumor presentation, and the Fuhrman nuclear grade. On multivariate analysis, the pathologic stage of the primary tumor defined according to the 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival, as well as age, mode of presentation, and nuclear grade. According to the multivariate analysis, the authors clustered patients into 3 groups with statistically significant outcome differences: 1) patients with <= 5.5-cm incidentally detected RCC; 2) patients with <= 5.5-cm symptomatic RCC) and 3) patients with > 5.5-cm RCC. This cancer-related outcome stratification was valid regardless of the patient's age. CONCLUSIONS. The 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be the optimal tumor size breakpoint with which to stratify patients with organ-confined RCC. The study supported the upgrade of the TNM classification system according to this breakpoint. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2116 / 2123
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Penile and preputial squamous cell carcinoma in the horse and proposal of a classification system
    Van den Top, J. G. B.
    Ensink, J. M.
    Barneveld, A.
    van Weeren, P. R.
    [J]. EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION, 2011, 23 (12) : 636 - 648
  • [32] Intracapsular clear cell renal carcinoma: Ploidy status improves the prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification
    Minervini, A
    Di Cristofano, C
    Collecchi, P
    Salinitri, G
    Selli, C
    Bevilacqua, G
    Minervini, R
    Cavazzana, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (04): : 1203 - 1207
  • [33] TNM Classification of Thyroid Carcinoma
    Ashok R. Shaha
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2007, 31 : 879 - 887
  • [34] TNM classification of thyroid carcinoma
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (05) : 879 - 887
  • [35] Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma -: A Swiss experience with 588 tumors
    Moch, H
    Gasser, T
    Amin, MB
    Torhorst, J
    Sauter, G
    Mihatsch, MJ
    [J]. CANCER, 2000, 89 (03) : 604 - 614
  • [36] Comparison of the 2002 and 2010 TNM classification systems regarding outcome prediction in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma
    Pichler, Martin
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Chromecki, Thomas F.
    Jesche, Johanna
    Kampel-Kettner, Karin
    Groselj-Strele, Andrea
    Hoefler, Gerald
    Pummer, Karl
    Zigeuner, Richard
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 62 (02) : 237 - 246
  • [37] Proposal Of A TNM Staging Classification System For Esthesioneuroblastoma: A More Precise Prediction Of Prognosis
    Sun, M.
    Wang, K.
    Qu, Y.
    Zhang, S. P.
    Chen, X.
    Wu, R.
    Zhang, Y.
    Huang, X. D.
    Yi, J.
    Xiao, J.
    Xu, G.
    Luo, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E829 - E829
  • [38] NEW CLASSIFICATION AND PATHOLOGICAL GRADING SYSTEM FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
    MacLean, F.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 23 - 23
  • [39] TNM Staging for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Time for a New Method
    Eggener, Scott
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) : 517 - 519
  • [40] A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Sun, Maxine
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Arjane, Philippe
    Widmer, Hugues
    Pharand, Daniel
    Latour, Mathieu
    Perrotte, Paul
    Patard, Jean-Jacques
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (05) : 775 - 781