Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma

被引:61
|
作者
Ficarra, V
Guillè, F
Schips, L
de la Taille, A
Galetti, TP
Tostain, J
Cindolo, L
Novara, G
Zigeuner, R
Bratti, E
Li, GR
Altieri, V
Abbou, CC
Zanolla, L
Artibani, W
Patard, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Urol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Rennes, Dept Urol, Rennes, France
[3] Graz Univ, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[4] CHU Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Urol, Padua, Italy
[6] CHU St Etienne, Dept Urol, St Etienne, France
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Urol, Naples, Italy
[8] Univ Verona, Dept Cardiol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
localized renal cell carcinoma; TNM classification system; nephron-sparing surgery; radial nephrectomy; partial nephrectomy; martingale residuals analysis;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21465
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The current study defined an optimal tumor size breakpoint to stratify localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into groups with significantly different cancer-related outcomes and proposed a revision of the TNM classification system. METHODS. The authors analyzed the data from 1138 patients who had undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for localized RCC at 7 European urologic centers. The optimal pathologic size breakpoint was calculated using the martingale residuals from a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS. The mean follow-up time was 87 months. The scatterplot of tumor size versus expected risk of death per patient suggested that an interval of 5-6 cm was appropriate. A total of 720 (63.3%) and 418 (36.7%) patients had tumors measuring <= 5.5-cm and tumors measuring > 5.5-cm, respectively. Significant cancer-specific survival differences between the two groups of patients were reported in the series by all the centers participating in the study. On univariate analysis, the other variables found to be associated with cancer-specific survival were the patient's age, symptomatic tumor presentation, and the Fuhrman nuclear grade. On multivariate analysis, the pathologic stage of the primary tumor defined according to the 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival, as well as age, mode of presentation, and nuclear grade. According to the multivariate analysis, the authors clustered patients into 3 groups with statistically significant outcome differences: 1) patients with <= 5.5-cm incidentally detected RCC; 2) patients with <= 5.5-cm symptomatic RCC) and 3) patients with > 5.5-cm RCC. This cancer-related outcome stratification was valid regardless of the patient's age. CONCLUSIONS. The 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be the optimal tumor size breakpoint with which to stratify patients with organ-confined RCC. The study supported the upgrade of the TNM classification system according to this breakpoint. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2116 / 2123
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision of TNM classification for oropharyngeal carcinoma
    Fleming, ID
    [J]. CANCER, 1998, 82 (09) : 1611 - 1612
  • [2] Staging of renal cell carcinoma: 2010 TNM classification system and validation in Turkey
    Ozkan, Tayyar Alp
    Yildiz, Kursat
    Dillioglugil, Ozdal
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (03): : 206 - 211
  • [3] PROPOSAL FOR PATHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMARY-CARCINOMA ACCORDING TO TNM SYSTEM
    BERNDT, H
    GUTZ, HJ
    JACOBASCH, KH
    PRAHL, B
    SCHREMMER, CN
    STROHWIG, R
    WILDNER, GP
    WOLFF, G
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR GESCHWULSTFORSCHUNG, 1973, 41 (02): : 146 - 163
  • [4] EVALUATION OF THE TNM CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM FOR CANCERS OF THE COLON AND RECTUM AND PROPOSAL FOR ITS REVISION
    YASUTOMI, M
    TAKAHASHI, T
    KATO, K
    MUTO, T
    YOSHIO, T
    KOYAMA, Y
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1981, 11 (02) : 335 - 342
  • [5] Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma
    Javidan, J
    Stricker, HJ
    Tamboli, P
    Amin, MB
    Peabody, JO
    Deshpande, A
    Menon, M
    Amin, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04): : 1277 - 1281
  • [6] Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma
    Javidan, J
    Tamboli, P
    Amin, M
    Stricker, H
    Peabody, JO
    Deshpande, A
    Farah, RN
    Amin, MB
    Menon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 167 - 167
  • [7] Validation of the 2009 TNM Classification for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison with the 2002 TNM Classification by Concordance Index
    Lee, Chunwoo
    You, Dalsan
    Park, Junsoo
    Jeong, In Gab
    Song, Cheryn
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (08) : 524 - 530
  • [8] Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma -: Significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system
    Gettman, MT
    Blute, ML
    Spotts, B
    Bryant, SC
    Zincke, H
    [J]. CANCER, 2001, 91 (02) : 354 - 361
  • [10] A proposal of revised TNM classification of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
    Yamasaki, S
    Makuuchi, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 32 : 170 - 170