Comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and direct infusion microchip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in global metabolomics of cell samples

被引:7
|
作者
Poho, Paivi [1 ,2 ]
Lipponen, Katriina [1 ,2 ]
Bespalov, Maxim M. [3 ]
Sikanen, Tiina [1 ,2 ]
Kotiaho, Tapio [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kostiainen, Risto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Pharm, Drug Res Program, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Chem & Technol, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Biomed Stem Cell Ctr, Stem Cells & Metab Res Program, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Metabolomics; Electrospray; Microchip; Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; Cells; Direct infusion mass spectrometry; STEM-CELLS; MS; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejps.2019.104991
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In this study, the feasibility of direct infusion electrospray ionization microchip mass spectrometry (chip-MS) was compared to the commonly used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in non-targeted metabolomics analysis of human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) reprogrammed from HFF. The total number of the detected features with chip-MS and LC-MS were 619 and 1959, respectively. Approximately 25% of detected features showed statistically significant changes between the cell lines with both analytical methods. The results show that chip-MS is a rapid and simple method that allows high sample throughput from small sample volumes and can detect the main metabolites and classify cells based on their metabolic profiles. However, the selectivity of chip-MS is limited compared to LC-MS and chip-MS may suffer from ion suppression.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of conventional, narrow-bore and capillary liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: Practical considerations
    Abian, J
    Oosterkamp, AJ
    Gelpi, E
    JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 1999, 34 (04): : 244 - 254
  • [22] Thin layer chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for direct analysis of raw samples
    Hu, Bin
    Xin, Gui-Zhong
    So, Pui-Kin
    Yao, Zhong-Ping
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1415 : 155 - 160
  • [23] Determination of glutathionyl hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Naito, C
    Kajita, M
    Niwa, T
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1999, 731 (01): : 121 - 124
  • [24] Signal and charge enhancement for protein analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with desorption electrospray ionization
    Liu, Yan
    Miao, Zhixin
    Lakshmanan, Rajeswari
    Loo, Rachel R. Ogorzalek
    Loo, Joseph A.
    Chen, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2012, 325 : 161 - 166
  • [25] Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry of Arsenic Compounds Using the Electrospray Ionization with Postcolumn Addition of Methanol
    Naoto Shimizu
    Yoshinori Inoue
    Shigeki Daishima
    Kenji Yamaguchi
    Analytical Sciences, 1999, 15 : 685 - 687
  • [26] Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of arsenic compounds using the electrospray ionization with postcolumn addition of methanol
    Shimizu, N
    Inoue, Y
    Daishima, S
    Yamaguchi, K
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 15 (07) : 685 - 687
  • [27] Effect of eluent on the ionization process in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Kostiainen, Risto
    Kauppila, Tiina J.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (04) : 685 - 699
  • [28] Sonic spray ionization interface for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Björkman, HT
    Edlund, PO
    Jacobsson, SP
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 468 (02) : 263 - 274
  • [29] SURVEY OF IONIZATION METHODS WITH EMPHASIS ON LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY
    NIBBERING, NMM
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1982, 251 (02): : 93 - 104
  • [30] New Ionization Technology for Interface of Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
    Tian, Tian
    Zhang, Fang
    Zhang, Shusheng
    Feng, Chenguo
    Su, Yue
    Lin, Guoqiang
    PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2020, 32 (05) : 604 - 616