Ranking of Indian Research-Intensive Higher Education Institutions using Multiple Ranking Methodologies: A Correlation Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Singh, Priyanka [1 ]
Joorel, J. P. Singh [2 ]
Solanki, Hiteshkumar [2 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [2 ]
Trivedi, Kruti [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Board Accreditat, New Delhi 110003, India
[2] Informat & Lib Network Ctr INFLIBNET, Infoc, Gandhinagar 382421, India
关键词
NIRF; India rankings; Research output; H-Index; Research institutions rankings; Higher education;
D O I
10.14429/djlit.41.1.16683
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This article ranks the same set of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in India using four different ranking methodologies, namely, i) NIRF (Overall): used for Overall category of India Rankings; NIRF (Only Research and Professional Practices parameters); iii) Research Ranking Methodology; a new methodology evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions under NIRF; and vi) IFQ2A index developed by Spanish group of scientists. The four sets of ranked institutions were obtained using methodologies mentioned above and correlation analysis was carried out on these four sets using Pearson Bivariate Correlation. It was found that a very strong and positive correlation exists between ranking of HEIs using new methodology (R2M) evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions and ranking by HEIs using IFQ2A Index.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stakeholders' Attitudes, Needs and Expectations from the Template Methodology for Multidimensional Ranking of Russian Higher Education Institutions
    Zavarykina, Lubov
    Lazutina, Irina
    Perfilieva, Olga
    VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 8 (01): : 60 - 79
  • [42] ENADE (RANKING OF BRAZILIAN UNIVERSITIES) AND THE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOLS IN PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: CURRICULUM IMPLICATIONS
    Rodrigues Martins, Maria Angelica
    Alonso, Denise de Fatima
    REVISTA ELETRONICA PESQUISEDUCA, 2012, 4 (07): : 184 - 200
  • [43] The research performance of top Indian and Chinese higher education institutions compared
    Prathap, Gangan
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2012, 102 (06): : 827 - 827
  • [44] Analysis of Perception and Public Preference on Reputation of Higher-Education Ranking Agencies
    Gunarto, Muji
    Nugraha, Dimas Yudistira
    Gaffar, Vanessa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2016, 15 : 364 - 370
  • [45] Ranking of Indian universities for their research output and quality using a new performance index
    Prathap, Gangan
    Gupta, B. M.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2009, 97 (06): : 751 - 752
  • [46] Twenty Years of Business and Economic Education Research: Ranking Analysis of the Journals
    Mendez-Carbajo, Diego
    Mixon, Franklin G., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, 2022, 33 (01) : 80 - 99
  • [47] The research-intensive university in a glonacal higher education system: the creation of the world-class university in China
    Yang, Lili
    Yang, Jiale
    Wang, Chuanyi
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 43 (04) : 415 - 434
  • [48] Methodologies for the Characterization of the Publication Output of Higher Education Institutions Using Institutional Databases
    Reale, Emanuela
    Poti, Bianca Maria
    Primeri, Emilia
    Lepori, Benedetto
    Probst, Carole
    Gomez Caridad, Isabel
    Alejandra De Filippo, Daniela
    Sanz Casado, Elias
    Van den Besselaar, Peter
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 2, 2009, 2 : 984 - +
  • [49] Assessing ranking and effectiveness of evolutionary algorithm hyperparameters using global sensitivity analysis methodologies
    Ojha, Varun
    Timmis, Jon
    Nicosia, Giuseppe
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2022, 74
  • [50] Ranking International Business Institutions and Faculty Members Using Research Publication as the MeasureUpdate and Extension of Prior Research
    Somnath Lahiri
    Vikas Kumar
    Management International Review, 2012, 52 : 317 - 340