Cervical cancer screening behaviors and proximity to federally qualified health centers in South Carolina

被引:2
|
作者
Adams, Swann Arp [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Haynes, Venice E. [3 ,4 ]
Brandt, Heather M. [3 ,4 ]
Choi, Seul Ki [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Young, Vicki [6 ]
Eberth, Jan M. [1 ,4 ]
Hebert, James R. [1 ,4 ]
Friedman, Daniela B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[4] Univ South Carolina, Statewide Canc Prevent & Control Program, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[5] Korea Inst Hlth & Social Affairs, Dept Hlth Care Policy Res, Yeongi Gun, South Korea
[6] South Carolina Primary Care Assoc, 3 Technol Circle, Columbia, SC 29203 USA
关键词
Cervical neoplasms; Cancer screening; Community health centers; Distance; TO-INCIDENCE RATIOS; BREAST-CANCER; TRAVEL-TIME; STAGE; DISPARITIES; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; DISTANCE; SOCIETY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2020.101681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Lack of participation in cervical cancer screening in underserved populations has been attributed to access to care, particularly among women in rural areas. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) were created to address this need in medically underserved populations. This study observed proximity to three health centers in relation to cervical cancer screening rates in South Carolina. Methods: Data were obtained from FQHC patient visits (from 3 centers) between 2007-2010 and were limited to women eligible for cervical cancer screening (n = 24,393). ArcGIS was used to geocode patients addresses and FQHC locations, and distance was calculated. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk of obtaining cervical cancer screening within one yearor ever, stratified by residential area. Results: Findings differed markedly by center and urban/rural status. At two health clinics, rural residents living the furthest away from the clinic (similar to 9 miles difference between quartile 4 and quartile 1) were more likely to be ever screened (RRs = 1.05 and 1.03, p-values < 0.05), while urban residents living the furthest away were less likely to be ever screened (RR = 0.85, p-value < 0.05). At the third center, only urban residents living the furthest away were more likely to be ever screened (RR = 1.02, p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Increased travel distance significantly increased the likelihood of cervical cancer screening at two FQHC sites while significantly decreasing the likelihood of screening at the 3rd site. These findings underscore the importance of contextual and environmental factors that impact use of cervical cancer screening services.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patients' Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Preparatory Education in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Gwede, Clement K.
    Koskan, Alexis M.
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    Davis, Stacy N.
    Ealey, Jamila
    Abdulla, Rania
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    Elliott, Gloria
    Lopez, Diana
    Shibata, David
    Roetzheim, Richard G.
    Meade, Cathy D.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (02) : 294 - 300
  • [22] Clinical Perspectives on Colorectal Cancer Screening at Latino-Serving Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Spofford, Mark
    Talbot, Jocelyn
    Huyen Hoai Do
    Taylor, Victoria M.
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 42 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [23] PREDICTORS OF COLON CANCER SCREENING AMONG INDIVIDUALS IN A NETWORK OF URBAN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS
    Greywoode, Ruby
    Jandorf, Lina
    Calman, Neil
    Itzkowitz, Steven
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S575 - S575
  • [24] Predictors of cancer screening in federally qualified health centers in the United States: A cross sectional study
    Stuckwisch, Ashley M.
    Narayan, Anand K.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12)
  • [25] Knowledge of oral cancer and screening practices of primary care providers at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Sohn, W
    Ismail, AI
    Kolker, JL
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2005, 65 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [26] Who Governs Federally Qualified Health Centers?
    Wright, Brad
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2013, 38 (01) : 27 - 55
  • [27] Implementing a Substance Use Screening Protocol in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Reddick, Blake
    Foli, Karen J.
    Coddington, Jennifer A.
    Hountz, Diane
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2023, 29 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [28] Eye Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Woodward, Maria A.
    Hicks, Patrice M.
    Harris-Nwanyanwu, Kristen
    Modjtahedi, Bobeck
    Chan, R. V. Paul
    Vogt, Emily L.
    Lu, Ming-Chen
    Newman-Casey, Paula Anne
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 131 (10) : 1225 - 1233
  • [29] HEPATITIS C VIRUS SCREENING IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS IN RURAL APPALACHIA
    Olanrewaju, F. S.
    McKenzie, S. W.
    Vanhook, P.
    Falodun, A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 67 (02) : 427 - 427
  • [30] Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Amanda F. Petrik
    Thuy Le
    Erin Keast
    Jennifer Rivelli
    Keshia Bigler
    Beverly Green
    William M. Vollmer
    Gloria Coronado
    Journal of Community Health, 2018, 43 : 128 - 136