Cervical cancer screening behaviors and proximity to federally qualified health centers in South Carolina

被引:2
|
作者
Adams, Swann Arp [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Haynes, Venice E. [3 ,4 ]
Brandt, Heather M. [3 ,4 ]
Choi, Seul Ki [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Young, Vicki [6 ]
Eberth, Jan M. [1 ,4 ]
Hebert, James R. [1 ,4 ]
Friedman, Daniela B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[4] Univ South Carolina, Statewide Canc Prevent & Control Program, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[5] Korea Inst Hlth & Social Affairs, Dept Hlth Care Policy Res, Yeongi Gun, South Korea
[6] South Carolina Primary Care Assoc, 3 Technol Circle, Columbia, SC 29203 USA
关键词
Cervical neoplasms; Cancer screening; Community health centers; Distance; TO-INCIDENCE RATIOS; BREAST-CANCER; TRAVEL-TIME; STAGE; DISPARITIES; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; DISTANCE; SOCIETY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2020.101681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Lack of participation in cervical cancer screening in underserved populations has been attributed to access to care, particularly among women in rural areas. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) were created to address this need in medically underserved populations. This study observed proximity to three health centers in relation to cervical cancer screening rates in South Carolina. Methods: Data were obtained from FQHC patient visits (from 3 centers) between 2007-2010 and were limited to women eligible for cervical cancer screening (n = 24,393). ArcGIS was used to geocode patients addresses and FQHC locations, and distance was calculated. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk of obtaining cervical cancer screening within one yearor ever, stratified by residential area. Results: Findings differed markedly by center and urban/rural status. At two health clinics, rural residents living the furthest away from the clinic (similar to 9 miles difference between quartile 4 and quartile 1) were more likely to be ever screened (RRs = 1.05 and 1.03, p-values < 0.05), while urban residents living the furthest away were less likely to be ever screened (RR = 0.85, p-value < 0.05). At the third center, only urban residents living the furthest away were more likely to be ever screened (RR = 1.02, p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Increased travel distance significantly increased the likelihood of cervical cancer screening at two FQHC sites while significantly decreasing the likelihood of screening at the 3rd site. These findings underscore the importance of contextual and environmental factors that impact use of cervical cancer screening services.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cancer Screening Through Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Spencer, Jennifer C.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (06) : 679 - 680
  • [2] National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Amboree, Trisha L.
    Montealegre, Jane R.
    Parker, Susan L.
    Garg, Ashvita
    Damgacioglu, Haluk
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Chiao, Elizabeth Y.
    Hill, Elizabeth G.
    Sonawane, Kalyani
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    Adsul, Prajakta
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (06) : 671 - 679
  • [3] Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Birkby, Genevieve
    Eberth, Jan M.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Flocke, Susan A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (04) : 568 - 575
  • [4] System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Daly, Jeanette M.
    Levy, Barcey T.
    Moss, Carol A.
    Bay, Camden P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 (01) : 212 - 219
  • [5] Patient knowledge and beliefs as barriers to extending cervical cancer screening intervals in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Hawkins, Nikki A.
    Benard, Vicki B.
    Greek, April
    Roland, Katherine B.
    Manninen, Diane
    Saraiya, Mona
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (05) : 641 - 645
  • [6] Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Two Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Watson, Lesley
    Cotter, Megan M.
    Shafer, Shauna
    Neloms, Kara
    Smith, Robert A.
    Sharpe, Katherine
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2021, 136 (04) : 397 - 402
  • [7] Communicating Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Light of New Guidelines: Clinical Practices at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Head, Katharine J.
    Johnson, Nicole L.
    Scott, Susanna Foxworthy
    Zimet, Gregory D.
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2020, 35 (07) : 815 - 821
  • [8] Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Roland, K. B.
    Benard, V. B.
    Greek, A.
    Hawkins, N. A.
    Manninen, D.
    Saraiya, M.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (05) : 419 - 425
  • [9] Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Hoover, Sonja
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Djenaba
    Wong, Faye L.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (06) : 877 - 883
  • [10] Impact of the Choose Well Initiative on Contraceptive Access at Federally Qualified Health Centers in South Carolina: A Midline Evaluation
    Beatty, Kate
    Smith, Michael G.
    de Jong, Jordan
    Weber, Amy
    Adelli, Rakesh
    Khoury, Amal
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 113 (11) : 1167 - 1172