Student performance and perceptions of anatomy and physiology across face-to-face, hybrid, and online teaching lab styles

被引:11
|
作者
Pollock, Nicholas B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Biol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
A&P; curricula; education; learning; pedagogy; COURSES; INSTRUCTION; COMMUNITY; COMPUTER; SENSE;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00074.2022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Health science represents the fastest-growing industry in the United States, a trend not predicted to slow for the next decade. The high demand for health professionals has led to increased demand for anatomy and physiology (A&P) courses and a transition to hybrid-style labs to meet the necessary increased enrollment without increasing the need for lab space and compromising educational quality. The transition to hybrid-style labs has only accelerated and become more important with the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been relatively unclear, however, how the hybrid style has impacted student learning, satisfaction, and performance. Furthermore, there is a general lack of research investigating the advantages and disadvantages across hybrid, online, and face-to-face styles. This lack of research is particularly obvious within biological sciences, including A&P. Attendance, practical grades, and overall grades were compared between face-to-face, hybrid, and online A&P lab styles. A survey was administered to compare student perceptions and experiences between hybrid and online lab styles. The hybrid style had many of the same advantages as online and face-to-face styles yet very few disadvantages. Hybrid lab students reported better experiences and greater satisfaction, attended more labs, and outperformed online lab students. Face-to-face lab students, however, outperformed hybrid lab students. These findings can ultimately inform how to best implement, organize, and improve hybrid-style labs to maximize student learning, achievement, and enjoyment. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Demand for health professionals increased the demand for A&P courses and led to a transition to hybrid-style labs. There is a general lack of research investigating advantages/disadvantages across hybrid, online, and face-toface styles. I found that the hybrid style had many of the advantages of online and face-to-face styles yet very few disadvantages. Hybrid lab students reported better experiences and greater satisfaction and outperformed online lab students. Face-to-face lab students, however, outperformed hybrid lab students.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 460
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Face-to-face, online or hybrid?: Perceptions and preferences by higher education teachers and students
    Pattier, Daniel
    Ferreira, Pedro Daniel
    [J]. REVISTA COMPLUTENSE DE EDUCACION, 2023, 34 (01): : 69 - 79
  • [12] Successful Integration of Face-to-Face Bootcamp Lab Courses in a Hybrid Online STEM Program
    Ardissone, Alexandria N.
    Oli, Monika W.
    Rice, Kelly C.
    Galindo, Sebastian
    Urrets-Zavalia, Macarena
    Wysocki, Allen F.
    Triplett, Eric W.
    Drew, Jennifer C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2019, 20 (03)
  • [13] An Assessment of Student Learning Perceptions in Concurrent Online and Face-to-Face Education Delivery Environments
    Raghavan, Vijay V.
    Braun, Frank
    Goh, Samuel
    [J]. AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [14] Shifting identities: an examination of student perceptions and experiences in face-to-face and online learning in Nepal
    Jeevan Khanal
    [J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 29 : 4287 - 4315
  • [15] Comparing Student Assessments and Perceptions of Online and Face-to-Face Versions of an Introductory Linguistics Course
    Johnson, David
    Palmer, Chris C.
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2015, 19 (02): : 33 - 50
  • [17] Student perceptions and instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis of online and face-to-face classroom settings
    Brocato B.R.
    Bonanno A.
    Ulbig S.
    [J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2015, 20 (1) : 37 - 55
  • [18] Comparison of student attitudes and performance in an online and a face-to-face inorganic chemistry course
    Nennig, Hannah T.
    Idarraga, Katrina L.
    Salzer, Luke D.
    Bleske-Rechek, April
    Theisen, Roslyn M.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01) : 168 - 177
  • [19] STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN ONLINE AND FACE-TO-FACE MICROECONOMICS: EVIDENCE FROM ADULT LEARNERS
    Medcalfe, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADULT AND CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2009, 15 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [20] The effect of face-to-face versus online learning on student performance in anatomy: an observational study using a causal inference approach
    Joanna Diong
    Hopin Lee
    Darren Reed
    [J]. Discover Education, 2 (1):