Student performance and perceptions of anatomy and physiology across face-to-face, hybrid, and online teaching lab styles

被引:11
|
作者
Pollock, Nicholas B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Biol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
A&P; curricula; education; learning; pedagogy; COURSES; INSTRUCTION; COMMUNITY; COMPUTER; SENSE;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00074.2022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Health science represents the fastest-growing industry in the United States, a trend not predicted to slow for the next decade. The high demand for health professionals has led to increased demand for anatomy and physiology (A&P) courses and a transition to hybrid-style labs to meet the necessary increased enrollment without increasing the need for lab space and compromising educational quality. The transition to hybrid-style labs has only accelerated and become more important with the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been relatively unclear, however, how the hybrid style has impacted student learning, satisfaction, and performance. Furthermore, there is a general lack of research investigating the advantages and disadvantages across hybrid, online, and face-to-face styles. This lack of research is particularly obvious within biological sciences, including A&P. Attendance, practical grades, and overall grades were compared between face-to-face, hybrid, and online A&P lab styles. A survey was administered to compare student perceptions and experiences between hybrid and online lab styles. The hybrid style had many of the same advantages as online and face-to-face styles yet very few disadvantages. Hybrid lab students reported better experiences and greater satisfaction, attended more labs, and outperformed online lab students. Face-to-face lab students, however, outperformed hybrid lab students. These findings can ultimately inform how to best implement, organize, and improve hybrid-style labs to maximize student learning, achievement, and enjoyment. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Demand for health professionals increased the demand for A&P courses and led to a transition to hybrid-style labs. There is a general lack of research investigating advantages/disadvantages across hybrid, online, and face-toface styles. I found that the hybrid style had many of the advantages of online and face-to-face styles yet very few disadvantages. Hybrid lab students reported better experiences and greater satisfaction and outperformed online lab students. Face-to-face lab students, however, outperformed hybrid lab students.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 460
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Students' Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy
    Albalushi, Halima
    Al Mushaiqri, Mohamed
    Sirasanagandla, Srinivasa Rao
    Das, Srijit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (20)
  • [2] Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: student perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face
    Horspool, Agi
    Lange, Carsten
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [3] Examining Students' Online Course Perceptions and Comparing Student Performance Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Classrooms
    Spencer, Dan
    Temple, Traci
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2021, 25 (02): : 233 - 261
  • [4] A comparative study on student perceptions of face-to-face learning and online learning
    Can, Gurhan
    Saglam, Mustafa
    Eristi, Bahadir
    Kurum, Dilruba
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (EDU'07): NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, : 41 - +
  • [5] COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ONLINE HYBRID AND FACE-TO-FACE TEACHING METHODS
    Sertsu, Sahlemedhin
    Chacon, Fabio
    [J]. INTED2012: INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2012, : 6266 - 6271
  • [6] Student Responses to Virtual Synchronous, Hybrid, and Face-to-Face Teaching/Learning
    Flynn-Wilson, Linda
    Reynolds, Kate E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2021, 4 (01): : 46 - 56
  • [7] Evolving roles of online and face-to-face instructors in a lecture/lab hybrid course
    Beck, Dennis
    Ferdig, Richard E.
    [J]. TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 7 (01): : 5 - 17
  • [8] Student Thinking Styles and Course Engagement in Online Versus Face-to-Face Marketing Courses
    Groza, Mark D.
    Groza, Mya P.
    Hasbrouck, Sue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [9] MSW Student Experiences in Online vs. Face-to-Face Teaching Formats?
    Okech, David
    Barner, John
    Segoshi, Megan
    Carney, Michelle
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2014, 33 (01) : 121 - 134
  • [10] Academic performance, teacher assessment and student-teacher interaction in online versus face-to-face teaching
    Fernandez-Castro, Alejandro M.
    Sanchez-Cabrero, Roberto
    Eiadat, Yousef Hussein
    [J]. REVISTA DIGITAL DE INVESTIGACION EN DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA-RIDU, 2023, 17 (02):