Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock

被引:33
|
作者
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Cardiol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
cardiogenic shock; congestive heart failure; intraaortic balloon pump; left ventricular assist device;
D O I
10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd5bc
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose of review This review will discuss the rationale and clinical utility of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in the management of patients with cardiogenic shock Recent findings Left ventricular assist devices maintain partial or total circulatory support in case of severe left ventricular failure. Currently, two percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are available for clinical use: the TandemHeart and the Impella Recover LP system. Compared with the intraaortic balloon pump, the TandemHeart has been shown to significantly reduce preload and to augment cardiac output. In a randomized comparison between the TandemHeart and intraaortic balloon pump support in patients with cardiogenic shock, the improved cardiac index afforded by the left ventricular assist device resulted in a more rapid decrease in serum lactate and improved renal function, There were, however, no significant differences with respect to 30-day mortality, and complications including limb ischemia and severe bleeding were more frequent with left ventricular assist devices than intraaortic balloon pump support. Summary The advent of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices constitutes an important advance in the management of patients with severe cardiogenic shock and may serve as bridge to recovery or heart transplantation in carefully selected patients. While improvement of hemodynamic parameters appears promising, it remains to be determined whether this benefit translates into improved clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implantable left ventricular assist devices as initial therapy for refractory postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock
    Pawale, Amit
    Pinney, Sean
    Ashley, Kimberly
    Flynn, Rachel
    Milla, Federico
    Anyanwu, Anelechi C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 44 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [42] Selective implantation of durable left ventricular assist devices as primary therapy for refractory cardiogenic shock
    Pawale, Amit
    Schwartz, Yosef
    Itagaki, Shinobu
    Pinney, Sean
    Adams, David H.
    Anyanwu, Anelechi C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (03): : 1059 - 1068
  • [43] Combined use of left ventricular assist devices in cardiogenic shock. Report of one case
    Hameau D, Rene
    Soriano, Francesco
    Oreglia, Jacopo
    Munoz, Rodrigo
    Luis Winter, Jose
    Valdebenito, Martin
    Quitral, Jorge
    Lindefjeld, Dante
    Veas, Nicolas
    [J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2020, 148 (03) : 409 - 413
  • [44] Percutaneous left ventricular assist support is associated with less pulmonary congestion and lower rate of pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock
    Haberkorn, Sandra
    Uwarow, Angelika
    Haurand, Jean
    Jung, Christian
    Kelm, Malte
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Horn, Patrick
    [J]. OPEN HEART, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [45] Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Blumer, V.
    Rivera-Maza, M.
    Friede, K. A.
    Truby, L. K.
    Mentz, R. J.
    Patel, M. R.
    Schroder, J. N.
    Zajarias, A.
    Amin, A.
    Russell, S. J.
    Katz, J. N.
    Agarwal, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S102 - S103
  • [46] Data for validation and adjustment of APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device
    Mierke, Johannes
    Nowack, Thomas
    Loehn, Tobias
    Kluge, Franziska
    Poege, Frederike
    Woitek, Felix
    Mangner, Norman
    Ibrahim, Karim
    Linke, Axel
    Pfluecke, Christian
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2022, 42
  • [47] Infarct-related cardiogenic shock - comparison of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic ballon counterpulsation
    Loehn, T. Tobias
    Schweigler, T.
    Kolschmann, S.
    Wenning, S.
    Quick, S.
    Youssef, A.
    Pfluecke, C.
    Guenther, M.
    Strasser, R.
    Ibrahim, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 271 - 271
  • [48] Targeted Evaluation of Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Shock or Hypotension
    Stenberg, Robert
    Shenvi, Christina
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 76 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [49] Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Cheng, J. M.
    Den Uil, C. A.
    Hoeks, S. E.
    Van der Ent, M.
    Jewbali, L. S. D.
    Van Domburg, R. T.
    Serruys, P. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 389 - 389
  • [50] PERCUTANEOUS LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES VERSUS INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP COUNTERPULSATION FOR TREATMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Cheng, J.
    den Uil, C.
    Hoeks, S.
    van der Ent, M.
    Jewbali, L.
    van Domburg, R.
    Serruys, P.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 109 - 109