R&D Intensity, Complementary Assets and Firm Value: Time Series Evidence from Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Demirgunes, Kartal [1 ]
Iltas, Yuksel [1 ]
机构
[1] Kirsehir Ahi Evran Univ, Fac Business & Adm, Kirsehir, Turkey
关键词
R&D intensity; Firm value; Complementary assets; Time series analysis; Borsa Istanbul; STOCK MARKETS VALUATION; OIL-PRICE SHOCK; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; UNIT-ROOT; VALUE-RELEVANCE; GREAT CRASH; PERFORMANCE; COINTEGRATION; EXPENDITURES; RETURNS;
D O I
10.26650/ISTJECON2020-0017
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper aims to test the value relevance of R&D intensity and complementary assets on quarterly time-series data regarding the R&D activities of Turkish manufacturing sector (comprising BIST listed manufacturing firms) in the period of 1992.Q1-2019.Q3. The presence of a unit root is tested by Augmented Dickey Fuller (1981) and Zivot and Andrews (1992) tests. Following this, one-break Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test is employed to detect structural break in the cointegrating relationship among series. Finally, the long-run coefficients estimated by Stock and Watson (1993)'s method of DOLS indicate that R&D intensity variable relative to net sales has statistically significant and positive effect on firm value, which then turns negative following the break date. The other R&D intensity variable relative to total assets fails to reveal any significant effect on firm value, both in the pre-and post-break date. Besides, complementary (tangible) assets have statistically significant and negative effect on firm value until the break date and this effect reverses following the break date. The break date of 2005.Q1 can be associated with the time-lag effects of several severe crises that the Turkish economy has experienced between 1999 and 2001.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 72
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ESG performance and firm misconduct: Evidence from R&D manipulation
    Chen, Mengtao
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 237
  • [42] R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model
    Yeh, Ming-Liang
    Chu, Hsiao-Ping
    Sher, Peter J.
    Chiu, Yi-Chia
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (03) : 389 - 401
  • [43] Firm's Environmental Expenditure, R&D Intensity, and Profitability
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Kim, Bowon
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [44] R&D intensity and firm performance-sectoral differences
    Kuittinen, Hanna
    Puumalainen, Kaisu
    Jantunen, Ari
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND VALUE CREATION, 2008, 2 : 39 - 53
  • [45] Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance
    Martin Falk
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2012, 39 : 19 - 37
  • [46] Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance
    Falk, Martin
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2012, 39 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [47] Capital Structure, Investment Opportunity Set, Growth Sales, Firm Size and Firm Value: R&D Intensity as Mediating
    Mahirun, Mahirun
    Kushermanto, Andi
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2018, 19 (164): : 117 - 122
  • [48] Does antidumping cause investment and R&D?: Evidence from Turkey
    Avsar, Veysel
    Sevinc, Nurgul
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (52) : 5674 - 5682
  • [49] The Effect of R&D and the Control-Ownership Wedge on Firm Value: Evidence from Korean Chaebol Firms
    Kang, Minjung
    Kim, Sangil
    Cho, Moon-Kyung
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [50] R&D Intensity and Financing Decisions: Evidence from European Firms
    Elkemali, Taoufik
    Ben Rejeb, Aymen
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2015, 35 (02): : 1042 - 1055