Morphological differences between the trabecular meshworks of zebrafish and mammals

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Chun-Chen [2 ,3 ]
Yeh, Lung-Kun [4 ,5 ]
Liu, Chia-Yang [6 ]
Kao, Winston W. -Y. [6 ]
Samples, John R. [7 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [8 ]
Hu, Fung-Rong [1 ]
Wang, I-Jong [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei City Hosp, Ren Ai Branch, Dept Ophthalmol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ Coll Med, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Cell Biol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Casey Eye Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[8] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
cytoskeleton; functional morphology; keratocan trabecular meshwork; lumican; proteoglycans;
D O I
10.1080/02713680701795026
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The zebrafish has been used as an animal model to study ocular development and diseases, including glaucoma. However, there are still many concerns about the morphological differences between zebrafish and mammals. Before using the zebrafish for glaucoma studies, we should understand the morphological differences in the trabecular meshworks (TMs) of zebrafish and other animal models. This study investigated and compared the histological morphologies and compositions of the extracellular matrices of the TMs of the zebrafish and some commonly used animal models, including the mouse, rat, rabbit, and cow. Methods: Sections of the angular portions from the studied species (mouse, rat, rabbit, cow, zebrafish, and human) were prepared for immunohistochemical and electron microscopic analyses. Antibodies directed against cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix components (AE1/AE3, vimentin, -smooth muscle actin, keratocan, and lumican) were used for immunolocalization. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for keratocan and lumican was also performed. Results: The TMs of the mouse, rat, and human consist of extracellular matrix organized into a network of beams covered in trabecular endothelial cells. However, no lamellate meshwork exists in the TMs of the rabbit, cow, or zebrafish. Instead, a reticular meshwork (rabbit and cow) and an annular ligament (zebrafish) develop. Immunohistological analysis revealed that vimentin is expressed in the TMs of the rat, rabbit, and human, and -smooth muscle actin is expressed in the TMs of the mouse, rat, rabbit, and human. Only the annular ligament of the zebrafish stained positively with anti-AE1/AE3 antibody. The annular ligament of the zebrafish also expresses keratocan and lumican. The human TM showed weakly positive staining of lumican. A prominent distribution of mitochondria and intracellular vacuoles is observed in the trabecular cells of the mouse, rat, rabbit, and cow, but not the zebrafish. The analysis of RT-PCR shows the keratocan and lumican mRNAs are expressed in the annular ligament of zebrafish, but not in mouse, rat, rabbit, and cow. Conclusions: We conclude that the zebrafish expresses different extracellular matrix proteins and has a distinctive ultrastructure in the TM. Therefore, zebrafish should be used with caution for glaucoma studies.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TRABECULAR ARRANGEMENT OF TOOTH SUPPORTING BONE OF MAMMALS
    HOBDELL, MH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1967, 46 (6P1S) : 1294 - &
  • [22] Morphological differences between the "races" of Drosophila pseudoobscura
    Mather, K
    Dobzhansky, T
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1939, 73 : 5 - 25
  • [23] Symptomatic and Morphological Differences between Choroidal Excavations
    Kumano, Yuji
    Nagai, Hirofumi
    Enaida, Hiroshi
    Ueno, Akifumi
    Matsui, Takaaki
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2013, 90 (04) : E110 - E118
  • [24] Morphological differences between anemophilous and entomophilous pollen
    Lu, Xiaojian
    Ye, Xiufen
    Liu, Jiaxi
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2022, 85 (03) : 1056 - 1064
  • [25] Morphological Differences between Virgin and Secondary Fibers
    Malachowska, Edyta
    Dubowik, Marcin
    Przybysz, Piotr
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [26] Statistical analysis of morphological differences between brains
    Vadakkumpadan, F
    Tong, YX
    Sun, YL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 116 (04) : 407 - 418
  • [27] Morphological differences between Chinese and Caucasian hips
    Kim, YJ
    Zhang, Y
    Xu, L
    Nevitt, MC
    Lane, NE
    Doherty, M
    Felson, D
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2004, 12 : S110 - S110
  • [28] MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LYNX AND BOBCAT SKULLS
    OMMUNDSEN, PD
    NORTHWEST SCIENCE, 1991, 65 (05) : 248 - 250
  • [29] Differences in global biomass and energy use between dinosaurs and mammals
    Trammer, Jerzy
    ACTA GEOLOGICA POLONICA, 2011, 61 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [30] Assessing Differences between Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Trabecular Meshwork Cells
    Snider, E. J.
    Pride, C.
    Stamer, W. D.
    Ethier, C. R.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S236 - S236