Quantifying multiple ecosystem services for adaptive management of green infrastructure

被引:22
|
作者
Wong, Christina P. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Bo [3 ]
Kinzig, Ann P. [4 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Changjiang Water Resources Protect Inst, Wuhan 430051, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2018年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptive management; constructed wetlands; ecological production functions; ecosystem services; green infrastructure; sustainable development; urban ecology; QUALITY; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2495
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Demands for ecosystem service assessments are growing around the world. However, management applications remain limited in part because we lack measurements linking ecosystem characteristics (ecosystem structure and processes) to final ecosystem services. Policymakers need marginal values, changes in final ecosystem services (direct link to human welfare) relative to additional units of ecosystem characteristics ( increment final ecosystem services/ increment ecosystem characteristics) to assess tradeoffs. Progress, however, has been slow due to confusion on ecological production functions (EPFs) in ecology. Here, we apply a new interdisciplinary approach to craft EPFs to evaluate four ecosystem services using the Yongding River Green Ecological Corridor as our case study. The Yongding Corridor is Beijing's largest, most expensive green infrastructure project (similar to $2.5 billion USD), constructed as a network of seven artificial lakes and wetlands. The Beijing Government wants the Yongding Corridor to improve four ecosystem services: (1) water storage, (2) local climate regulation, (3) water purification, and (4) aesthetics. We first worked with stakeholders to determine final ecosystem service levels and then used the Variable Infiltration Capacity model to estimate key ecosystem processes from the designed lakes and wetlands. We coupled the modeling with ecological field data and social surveys to create EPFs. We evaluated the ecosystem services by calculating shortfalls and then determined synergies and tradeoffs to identify actions for reducing shortfalls. We found the Yongding Corridor is meeting desired levels for aesthetics, but incurred shortfalls on the remaining services. To obtain the desired services, we recommend managers: (1) maintain inflow rates and/or make the lakes deeper to reduce water loss rates; (2) improve water quality-wetlands have high nutrient retention, but nutrient loads must be reduced; and (3) plant shade trees since evaporative cooling from the lakes and wetlands is having no measurable impact on human comfort. Results indicate the absence of ecosystem functions in landscape design led to shortfalls, but solutions require coupling green and built infrastructure to obtain multi-functionality. Managers found marginal values useful for clarifying connections, which led to adaptive policy changes for improving green infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Network of Green Infrastructure Based on Ecosystem Services Supply in Central Europe
    Fnukalova, Eliska
    Zyka, Vladimir
    Romportl, Dusan
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (06)
  • [22] The Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation
    Ersoy Mirici, Merve
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [23] High Biodiversity of Green Infrastructure Does Not Contribute to Recreational Ecosystem Services
    Sikorska, Daria
    Sikorski, Piotr
    Hopkins, Richard James
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
  • [24] Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services
    Andersson, Erik
    Barthel, Stephan
    Borgstrom, Sara
    Colding, Johan
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Folke, Carl
    Gren, Asa
    [J]. AMBIO, 2014, 43 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [25] Defining Passive Green Infrastructure: An Ecosystem Services Perspective to Make It Count
    Shuster, W. D.
    Pavao-Zuckerman, M.
    Mayer, A. L.
    Herrmann, D. L.
    Schifman, L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE WATER IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (03):
  • [26] Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa
    du Toit, Marie J.
    Cilliers, Sarel S.
    Dallimer, Martin
    Goddard, Mark
    Guenat, Solene
    Cornelius, Susanna F.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 180 : 249 - 261
  • [27] Inclusive landscapes and ecological urban planning: green infrastructure and ecosystem services
    Acierno, Antonio
    [J]. TRIA-TERRITORIO DELLA RICERCA SU INSEDIAMENTI E AMBIENTE, 2018, 11 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [28] ASSESSING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF BORNOVA'S GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, IZMIR (TURKEY)
    Coskun-Hepcan, Cigdem
    Hepcan, Serif
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (5A): : 3530 - 3541
  • [29] A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 293
  • [30] A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 293