Quantifying multiple ecosystem services for adaptive management of green infrastructure

被引:22
|
作者
Wong, Christina P. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Bo [3 ]
Kinzig, Ann P. [4 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Changjiang Water Resources Protect Inst, Wuhan 430051, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2018年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptive management; constructed wetlands; ecological production functions; ecosystem services; green infrastructure; sustainable development; urban ecology; QUALITY; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2495
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Demands for ecosystem service assessments are growing around the world. However, management applications remain limited in part because we lack measurements linking ecosystem characteristics (ecosystem structure and processes) to final ecosystem services. Policymakers need marginal values, changes in final ecosystem services (direct link to human welfare) relative to additional units of ecosystem characteristics ( increment final ecosystem services/ increment ecosystem characteristics) to assess tradeoffs. Progress, however, has been slow due to confusion on ecological production functions (EPFs) in ecology. Here, we apply a new interdisciplinary approach to craft EPFs to evaluate four ecosystem services using the Yongding River Green Ecological Corridor as our case study. The Yongding Corridor is Beijing's largest, most expensive green infrastructure project (similar to $2.5 billion USD), constructed as a network of seven artificial lakes and wetlands. The Beijing Government wants the Yongding Corridor to improve four ecosystem services: (1) water storage, (2) local climate regulation, (3) water purification, and (4) aesthetics. We first worked with stakeholders to determine final ecosystem service levels and then used the Variable Infiltration Capacity model to estimate key ecosystem processes from the designed lakes and wetlands. We coupled the modeling with ecological field data and social surveys to create EPFs. We evaluated the ecosystem services by calculating shortfalls and then determined synergies and tradeoffs to identify actions for reducing shortfalls. We found the Yongding Corridor is meeting desired levels for aesthetics, but incurred shortfalls on the remaining services. To obtain the desired services, we recommend managers: (1) maintain inflow rates and/or make the lakes deeper to reduce water loss rates; (2) improve water quality-wetlands have high nutrient retention, but nutrient loads must be reduced; and (3) plant shade trees since evaporative cooling from the lakes and wetlands is having no measurable impact on human comfort. Results indicate the absence of ecosystem functions in landscape design led to shortfalls, but solutions require coupling green and built infrastructure to obtain multi-functionality. Managers found marginal values useful for clarifying connections, which led to adaptive policy changes for improving green infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing Multiple Ecosystem Services for Landscape Conservation: A Green Infrastructure in Lombardy Region
    Arcidiacono, Andrea
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM 2016, WMCAUS 2016, 2016, 161 : 2297 - 2303
  • [2] Green infrastructure and ecosystem services - is the devil in the detail?
    Cameron, Ross W. F.
    Blanusa, Tijana
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2016, 118 (03) : 377 - 391
  • [3] Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health
    Coutts, Christopher
    Hahn, Micah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (08) : 9768 - 9798
  • [4] Ecosystem Services, Green Infrastructure and Spatial Planning
    Zoppi, Corrado
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [5] Adaptive management for ecosystem services
    Birge, Hannah E.
    Allen, Craig R.
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    Pope, Kevin L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 343 - 352
  • [6] A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Capra-Ribeiro, Fabio
    Moscardo, Vanessa
    Mayor-Vitoria, Fernando
    Gallardo, Laura O.
    Carracedo, Patricia
    Dietrich, Kristin
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86
  • [7] Adaptive management for soil ecosystem services
    Birge, Hannah E.
    Bevans, Rebecca A.
    Allen, Craig R.
    Angeler, David G.
    Baer, Sara G.
    Wall, Diana H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 371 - 378
  • [8] A Multidimensional Assessment of Ecosystem Services: From Grey to Green Infrastructure
    Caprioli, Caterina
    Oppio, Alessandra
    Baldassarre, Roberta
    Grassi, Riccardo
    Dell'Ovo, Marta
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, ICCSA 2021, PT VII, 2021, 12955 : 569 - 581
  • [9] Green Infrastructure to Improve Ecosystem Services in the Landscape Urban Regeneration
    Semeraro, Teodoro
    Aretano, Roberta
    Pomes, Alessandro
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [10] Planning Cemeteries: Their Potential Contribution to Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services
    McClymont, Katie
    Sinnett, Danielle
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2021, 3