What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data

被引:315
|
作者
Pfaff, ASP [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Econ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Ctr Environm Res & Conservat, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeem.1998.1056
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While previous empirical analysis of deforestation focused on population, this paper builds from a model of land use which suggests many determinants of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. I derive a deforestation equation from this model and test a number of those factors using county-level data for the period 1978-1988. The data include a satellite deforestation measure which allows improved within-country analysis. The major empirical finding is the significance of both land characteristics (such as soil quality and vegetation density) and factors affecting transport costs (such as distance to major markets and both own- and neighboring-county roads). Government development projects also appear to affect clearing, although credit infrastructure does not. However, as such policies themselves may be functions of other factors, estimated effects of policies must be interpreted with some caution. Finally, the population density does not have a significant effect on deforestation when many potential determinants are included. However, a quadratic specification reveals a more robust result: the first migrants to a county have greater impact than later immigrants. This implies that the distribution of population affects its impact. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 43
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Annual fluxes or carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon
    Houghton, RA
    Skole, DL
    Nobre, CA
    Hackler, JL
    Lawrence, KT
    Chomentowski, WH
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 403 (6767) : 301 - 304
  • [22] Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon
    R. A. Houghton
    D. L. Skole
    Carlos A. Nobre
    J. L. Hackler
    K. T. Lawrence
    W H. Chomentowski
    [J]. Nature, 2000, 403 : 301 - 304
  • [23] Family planning and deforestation: evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon
    Sellers, Samuel
    [J]. POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 38 (04) : 424 - 447
  • [24] Family planning and deforestation: evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon
    Samuel Sellers
    [J]. Population and Environment, 2017, 38 : 424 - 447
  • [25] Correlates of deforestation in Turkey: evidence from high-resolution satellite data
    Adiguzel, Fatih Serkant
    [J]. NEW PERSPECTIVES ON TURKEY, 2023, 68 : 30 - 48
  • [26] Linking Local Infrastructure Development and Deforestation: Evidence from Satellite and Administrative Data
    Baehr, Christian
    BenYishay, Ariel
    Parks, Bradley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2021, 8 (02) : 375 - 409
  • [27] Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Yuanwei Qin
    Xiangming Xiao
    Jean-Pierre Wigneron
    Philippe Ciais
    Martin Brandt
    Lei Fan
    Xiaojun Li
    Sean Crowell
    Xiaocui Wu
    Russell Doughty
    Yao Zhang
    Fang Liu
    Stephen Sitch
    Berrien Moore
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2021, 11 : 442 - 448
  • [28] Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Qin, Yuanwei
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Wigneron, Jean-Pierre
    Ciais, Philippe
    Brandt, Martin
    Fan, Lei
    Li, Xiaojun
    Crowell, Sean
    Wu, Xiaocui
    Doughty, Russell
    Zhang, Yao
    Liu, Fang
    Sitch, Stephen
    Moore, Berrien
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 11 (05) : 442 - +
  • [29] Fire Occurrences and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Silva, Claudia Arantes
    Santilli, Giancarlo
    Sano, Edson Eyji
    Laneve, Giovanni
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 18
  • [30] Economic Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Panel Data Analysis for the 2000s
    Jorge Hargrave
    Krisztina Kis-Katos
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2013, 54 : 471 - 494