Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboprophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Fan, Chaofeng [1 ]
Jia, Lu [2 ]
Fang, Fang [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [3 ]
Faramand, Andrew [4 ]
Chong, Weelic [5 ]
Hai, Yang [6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Hofstra Northwell, Zucker Sch Med, New York, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep venous thrombosis; intermittent pneumatic compression; meta-analysis; venous thromboembolism; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MEDICAL PATIENTS; PREVENTION; THROMBOSIS; STROKE;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12566
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives This study assessed the effect of adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on venous thromboembolism incidence in hospitalized patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register with no language restrictions from inception until May 15, 2019, for randomized clinical trials comparing adjunctive IPC in pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. Two researchers extracted data from published reports independently. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the risk ratio (RR) using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results Eight trials with a total of 7,354 participants were eligible for analysis. Addition of IPC to pharmacologic prophylaxis compared to pharmacologic prophylaxis alone reduced the risk of DVT by 43% (RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.93; I2 = 0%), with benefit only seen in surgical patients (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.59; I-2 = 0%) and not in medical patients (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.07; I-2 = 0%; p for interaction = .008). Addition of IPC reduced the risk for PE by 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; I-2 = 0%), with benefit only seen in surgical patients (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.65; I-2 = 0%) and not in medical patients (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.32-2.26; I-2 = 0%; p for interaction = .18) Conclusions Addition of IPC to pharmacologic prophylaxis confers moderate benefit on venous thromboembolism, with benefit confined to surgical patients. For medical patients, there was a trend toward reduced DVT with adjunctive IPC, which warrants further investigation. Clinical Relevance Venous thromboembolism is not unusual among hospitalized patients despite pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Nursing personnel should use adjunctive IPC in surgical patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Di Nisio, M.
    Candeloro, M.
    Rutjes, A. W. S.
    Porreca, E.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2018, 16 (07) : 1336 - 1346
  • [42] Intermittent pneumatic compression in patients with ESRD. A systematic review
    Torres, Christian
    Fuentes, Harry E.
    Saadaldin, Hassan
    Salazar, Juan P.
    Paz, Luis H.
    Diaz, Luis
    Doukky, Rami
    Hart, Peter D.
    Tafur, Alfonso J.
    HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 23 (04) : 433 - 444
  • [43] High-dose versus low-dose venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emanuele Valeriani
    Angelo Porfidia
    Walter Ageno
    Silvia Spoto
    Roberto Pola
    Marcello Di Nisio
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2022, 17 : 1817 - 1825
  • [44] High-dose versus low-dose venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valeriani, Emanuele
    Porfidia, Angelo
    Ageno, Walter
    Spoto, Silvia
    Pola, Roberto
    Di Nisio, Marcello
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (06) : 1817 - 1825
  • [45] Prophylactic platelet transfusions versus no prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with thrombocytopenia: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Anthon, Carl Thomas
    Granholm, Anders
    Sivapalan, Praleene
    Zellweger, Nuria
    Pene, Frederic
    Puxty, Kathryn
    Perner, Anders
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    Russell, Lene
    TRANSFUSION, 2022, 62 (10) : 2117 - 2136
  • [46] Efficacy of preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis on occurrence of venous thromboembolism following gynecologic oncology surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ince, C.
    Nardell, M.
    Bisch, S. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 296 - 297
  • [47] High versus Standard Intensity of Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kollias, Anastasios
    Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.
    Trontzas, Ioannis P.
    Rapti, Vassiliki
    Kyriakoulis, Ioannis G.
    Theochari, Christina A.
    Dimakakos, Evangelos
    Poulakou, Garyphallia
    Syrigos, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Miao
    Wang, Guiyue
    Li, Yuhang
    Wang, Hongliang
    Liu, Haitao
    Guo, Nana
    Han, Ci
    Peng, Yahui
    Yang, Mengyuan
    Liu, Yansong
    Ma, Xiaohui
    Yu, Kaijiang
    Wang, Changsong
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [49] Perioperative Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Guo, Qiang
    Huang, Bin
    Zhao, Jichun
    Ma, Yukui
    Yuan, Ding
    Yang, Yi
    Du, Xiaojiong
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (06) : 1087 - 1093
  • [50] Mechanical thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Limpus, Anthony
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    McDonald, Ellen
    Thalib, Lukman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 15 (04) : 402 - 412