Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort

被引:17
|
作者
Canivet, Catarina [1 ]
Nilsson, Anton [2 ]
Bjork, Jonas [2 ,3 ]
Moghaddassi, Mahnaz [1 ]
Ostergren, Per-Olof [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Malmo, Social Med & Global Hlth, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Lab Med, EPI LUND, Epidemiol,Populat Studies & Infrastruct, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Clin Studies Sweden, Malmo, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Population-based study; register data; bias; selection; epidemiology; follow-up studies; cohort studies; public health; PARTICIPATION; NONPARTICIPATION; GHQ;
D O I
10.1177/1403494820919544
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: To investigate potential differences between participants and dropouts in the 2005 follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Study regarding the prevalence of commonly studied health determinants and whether these factors had differential associations with three health outcomes: all-cause mortality and purchase of prescribed cardiovascular or psychotropic drugs during a 10-year follow-up period. Methods: The Scania Public Health Cohort was initiated in 1999/2000, with randomly invited participants aged 18-80 years from the general population (58% participation). Questionnaire data from 10,462 participants and 2576 dropouts in the 2005 follow-up (80% participation) were linked to public registers on mortality and purchase of prescribed drugs. Results: Age, male gender, being born abroad, low educational level, low self-rated mental and general health and daily smoking were all related to dropping out. The 10-year mortality was higher among dropouts (13.4% versus 11.9%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-1.8). In 13 out of 18 analyses, similar associations between health determinants and outcomes were found across participants and dropouts. However, being born outside of Sweden was associated with higher risks for all three poor health outcomes among participants, but not so among dropouts. Conclusions: Despite selective participation at follow-up, there was little evidence of selection bias, insofar as estimated associations were generally similar across participants, dropouts and the whole cohort. This finding is important for the assessment of the validity of prospective findings from this cohort and similar ones, where the loss of individuals at consecutive follow-ups of exposure is non-negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Follow-up guide issued on medicine and public health collaboration
    不详
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 1999, 114 (01) : 11 - 11
  • [32] Mobile telephone follow-up assessment of postdischarge death and disability due to trauma in Cameroon: a prospective cohort study
    Ding, Kevin
    Sur, Patrick J.
    Mbianyor, Mbiarikai Agbor
    Carvalho, Melissa
    Oke, Rasheedat
    Dissak-Delon, Fanny Nadia
    Signe-Tanjong, Magdalene
    Mfopait, Florentine Y.
    Essomba, Frank
    Mbuh, Golda E.
    Mballa, Georges Alain Etoundi
    Christie, S. Ariane
    Juillard, Catherine
    Mefire, Alain Chichom
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04): : e056433
  • [33] Loss to follow-up and bias assessment among a cohort of Thai men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand
    Pattanasin, Sarika
    Wimonsate, Wipas
    Chonwattana, Wannee
    Tongtoyai, Jaray
    Chaikummao, Supaporn
    Sriporn, Anuwat
    Sukwicha, Wichuda
    Mock, Philip A.
    Holtz, Timothy H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2016, 27 (03) : 196 - 206
  • [34] RESPONSE AND FOLLOW-UP BIAS IN COHORT STUDIES (vol 106, pg 184, 1977)
    Greenland, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 186 (01) : 129 - 129
  • [35] Selection bias in follow-up interviews with individuals attending the emergency department for occupational injuries
    Oesterlund, Anna H.
    Lander, Flemming
    Rytter, Soren
    Lauritsen, Jens
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2017, 23 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [36] Selection bias in clinical studies of first-episode psychosis: A follow-up study
    Walta, Maija
    Laurikainen, Heikki
    Armio, Reetta-Liina
    From, Tiina
    Tolvanen, Arvi
    Salokangas, Raimo K. R.
    Hietala, Jarmo
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2022, 246 : 235 - 240
  • [37] The Barcelona Brain Health Initiative: Cohort description and first follow-up
    Cattaneo, Gabriele
    Bartres-Faz, David
    Morris, Timothy P.
    Solana Sanchez, Javier
    Macia, Didac
    Tormos, Josep M.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [38] Prevalence and correlates of prostatitis in the health professionals follow-up study cohort
    Collins, MM
    Meigs, JB
    Barry, MJ
    Corkery, EW
    Giovannucci, E
    Kawachi, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03): : 1363 - 1366
  • [39] ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOW-UP IN PSYCHOANALYSIS
    SCHLESSINGER, N
    ROBBINS, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION, 1974, 22 (03) : 542 - 567
  • [40] Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up?
    Hille, ETM
    den Ouden, AL
    Stuifbergen, MC
    Verrips, GHW
    Vogels, AGC
    Brand, R
    Gravenhorst, JB
    Verloove-Vanhorick, S
    [J]. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 81 (11) : 901 - 908