Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort

被引:17
|
作者
Canivet, Catarina [1 ]
Nilsson, Anton [2 ]
Bjork, Jonas [2 ,3 ]
Moghaddassi, Mahnaz [1 ]
Ostergren, Per-Olof [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Malmo, Social Med & Global Hlth, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Lab Med, EPI LUND, Epidemiol,Populat Studies & Infrastruct, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Clin Studies Sweden, Malmo, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Population-based study; register data; bias; selection; epidemiology; follow-up studies; cohort studies; public health; PARTICIPATION; NONPARTICIPATION; GHQ;
D O I
10.1177/1403494820919544
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: To investigate potential differences between participants and dropouts in the 2005 follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Study regarding the prevalence of commonly studied health determinants and whether these factors had differential associations with three health outcomes: all-cause mortality and purchase of prescribed cardiovascular or psychotropic drugs during a 10-year follow-up period. Methods: The Scania Public Health Cohort was initiated in 1999/2000, with randomly invited participants aged 18-80 years from the general population (58% participation). Questionnaire data from 10,462 participants and 2576 dropouts in the 2005 follow-up (80% participation) were linked to public registers on mortality and purchase of prescribed drugs. Results: Age, male gender, being born abroad, low educational level, low self-rated mental and general health and daily smoking were all related to dropping out. The 10-year mortality was higher among dropouts (13.4% versus 11.9%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-1.8). In 13 out of 18 analyses, similar associations between health determinants and outcomes were found across participants and dropouts. However, being born outside of Sweden was associated with higher risks for all three poor health outcomes among participants, but not so among dropouts. Conclusions: Despite selective participation at follow-up, there was little evidence of selection bias, insofar as estimated associations were generally similar across participants, dropouts and the whole cohort. This finding is important for the assessment of the validity of prospective findings from this cohort and similar ones, where the loss of individuals at consecutive follow-ups of exposure is non-negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates
    Alvaro Alonso
    María Seguí-Gómez
    Jokin de Irala
    Almudena Sánchez-Villegas
    Juan José Beunza
    Miguel Ángel Martínez-Gonzalez
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, 21 : 351 - 358
  • [2] Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates
    Alonso, Alvaro
    Segui-Gomez, Maria
    de Irala, Jokin
    Sanchez-Villegas, Almudena
    Beunza, Juan Jose
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 (05) : 351 - 358
  • [3] Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies
    Howe, Chanelle J.
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Lau, Bryan
    Napravnik, Sonia
    Eron, Joseph J., Jr.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [4] Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies
    Biele, Guido
    Gustavson, Kristin
    Czajkowski, Nikolai Olavi
    Nilsen, Roy Miodini
    Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted
    Magnus, Per Minor
    Stoltenberg, Camilla
    Aase, Heidi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (10) : 927 - 938
  • [5] Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies
    Guido Biele
    Kristin Gustavson
    Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski
    Roy Miodini Nilsen
    Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud
    Per Minor Magnus
    Camilla Stoltenberg
    Heidi Aase
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2019, 34 : 927 - 938
  • [6] RESPONSE AND FOLLOW-UP BIAS IN COHORT STUDIES
    GREENLAND, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1977, 106 (03) : 184 - 187
  • [7] RESPONSE AND FOLLOW-UP BIAS IN COHORT STUDIES
    Greenland, Sander
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (11) : 1044 - 1047
  • [8] INFORMATION AND SELECTION BIAS DUE TO LOSS-TO-FOLLOW-UP IN OCCUPATIONAL COHORT STUDIES
    LOOMIS, DP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 134 (07) : 738 - 738
  • [9] Bias due to incomplete follow up in a cohort study
    Pennefather, PM
    Tin, W
    Clarke, MP
    Dutton, J
    Fritz, S
    Hey, EN
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 3224 - 3224
  • [10] Bias due to incomplete follow up in a cohort study
    Pennefather, PM
    Tin, W
    Clarke, MP
    Dutton, J
    Fritz, S
    Hey, EN
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (06) : 643 - 645