Measuring good governance: piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles

被引:16
|
作者
Pomeranz, Emily F. [1 ,2 ]
Stedman, Richard C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, Ctr Conservat Social Sci, Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, 4166 Legacy Pkwy, Lansing, MI 48911 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Natural resource governance; good governance; community-based resource management; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As federal, state, and local governments and agencies respond to calls to make decisions and implement programs according to tenets of 'good governance', a need exists to develop methods for systematically evaluating performance. 'Good governance' has been characterized as including a wide array of principles, which vary across literatures. Comparatively little scholarship has sought to systematically quantify program achievement in accordance with these principles. We develop and present a scale for measuring program achievement in accordance with eight main principles of good governance: inclusivity, fairness, transparency, accountability, legitimacy, direction, performance, and capability. We present the results of a pilot implementation of the scale within the context of two community-based deer management programs. Our results suggest that these principles of good governance may not sort into distinct dimensions in a real-world context.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 440
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Good governance principles in a department: An implementation
    Ayundhari, V. L.
    Hidayat, A. N.
    Adyawanti, T.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 17 - 22
  • [2] Measuring Good Governance for Better Government
    Mursyidah, Lailul
    Abadi, Totok Wahyu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUALS' GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY (ICIGR 2017), 2017, 125 : 294 - 296
  • [3] Validity evidence for a new instrument measuring the perception of (good) governance in sports organizations
    Furtado, Sabrina
    Goncalves, Gabriel Henrique Treter
    Mezzadri, Fernando Marinho
    [J]. RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2024, (55):
  • [4] Good Governance as Reflexive Governance: In Praise of Good Colleagueship
    Trommel, Willem
    [J]. PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2020, 22 (03) : 227 - 235
  • [5] Putting the principles of good governance into clinical practice
    Churchill, David
    [J]. OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2008, 10 (02): : 93 - 98
  • [6] Rethinking Good Governance Identifying Common Principles
    van Doeveren, Veerle
    [J]. PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2011, 13 (04) : 301 - 318
  • [7] Is Good Governance Good for Development?
    Barkin, David
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (04) : 671 - 673
  • [8] Good governance
    Vos-Ceelen, M. W.
    Rodenhuis, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 : 27 - 27
  • [9] good governance ...
    Regitz, Hartmut
    [J]. TANZ, 2014, (01): : 64 - 66
  • [10] Good governance
    Friedman, AW
    [J]. ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP, 1996, 82 (04): : 41 - 43