共 35 条
Effect of a solar lighting intervention on fuel-based lighting use and exposure to household air pollution in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trial
被引:4
|作者:
Wallach, Eli S.
[1
]
Lam, Nicholas L.
[1
]
Nuwagira, Edwin
[2
]
Muyanja, Daniel
[2
]
Tayebwa, Mellon
[2
]
Valeri, Linda
[3
]
Tsai, Alexander C.
[4
,5
,6
]
Vallarino, Jose
[7
]
Allen, Joseph G.
[7
]
Lai, Peggy S.
[6
,7
,8
]
机构:
[1] Calif State Polytech Univ Humboldt, Schatz Energy Res Ctr, Arcata, CA USA
[2] Mbarara Univ Sci & Technol, Mbarara, Uganda
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mongan Inst, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
black carbon;
energy access;
fine particulate matter (PM2.5);
household air pollution;
kerosene;
lighting;
solar home system;
COOKSTOVE INTERVENTION;
KEROSENE;
EMISSIONS;
CHILDHOOD;
PNEUMONIA;
PARTICLES;
CHILDREN;
COOKING;
QUALITY;
HEALTH;
D O I:
10.1111/ina.12986
中图分类号:
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号:
0813 ;
摘要:
Solar lighting is an alternative to polluting kerosene and other fuel-based lighting devices relied upon by millions of families in resource-limited settings. Whether solar lighting provides sustained displacement of fuel-based lighting sources and reductions in personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and black carbon (BC) has not been examined in randomized controlled trials. Eighty adult women living in rural Uganda who utilized fuel-based (candles and kerosene lamps) and/or clean (solar, grid, and battery-powered devices) lighting were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a home solar lighting system at no cost to study participants (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03351504). Among intervention group participants, kerosene lamps were completely displaced in 92% of households using them. The intervention led to an average exposure reduction of 36.1 mu g/m(3) (95% CI -70.3 to -2.0) in PM2.5 and 10.8 mu g/m(3) (95% CI -17.6 to -4.1) in BC, corresponding to a reduction from baseline of 37% and 91%, respectively. Reductions were greatest among participants using kerosene lamps. Displacement of kerosene lamps and personal exposure reductions were sustained over 12 months of follow-up. Solar lighting presents an immediate opportunity for achieving sustained reductions in personal exposure to PM2.5 and BC and should be considered in household air pollution intervention packages.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文