Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Yue, Tian [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Hui [2 ]
Kong, Zhaowei [3 ]
Qi, Fengxue [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Sport Univ, Sch Sports Med & Rehabil, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Sport Univ, China Inst Sport & Hlth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Educ, Macau, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Sport Univ, Sports Exercise & Brain Sci Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
cardiovascular disease; cardiac rehabilitation; high-intensity interval training; peak oxygen uptake; cardiorespiratory fitness; moderate-intensity continuous training; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; AEROBIC INTERVAL; CONTINUOUS EXERCISE; LOW-VOLUME; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; AUTONOMIC FUNCTION; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; OXYGEN-UPTAKE; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.845225
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies have shown that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for increasing peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. To our knowledge, previously published systematic reviews have neither compared different HIIT models with MICT nor investigated intervention frequencies of HIIT vs. MICT for purposes of improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of different training models, intervention frequencies and weeks of HIIT vs. MICT on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness during cardiac rehabilitation (CR).Methods: A systematic search was carried out for research articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases for the period up to December 2021. We searched for RCTs that compared the effect of HIIT vs. MICT on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.Results: Twenty-two studies with 949 participants (HIIT: 476, MICT: 473) met the inclusion criteria. Sensitivity analysis revealed that HIIT increased VO2peak more than MICT (MD = 1.35). In the training models and durations, there was a greater increase in VO2peak with medium-interval HIIT (MD = 4.02) and more than 12 weeks duration (MD = 2.35) than with MICT. There were significant improvements in VO2peak with a HIIT frequency of 3 times/week (MD = 1.28). Overall, one minor cardiovascular and four non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the HIIT group, while six non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the MICT group.Conclusion: HIIT is safe and appears to be more effective than MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD. Medium-interval HIIT 3 times/week for more than 12 weeks resulted in the largest improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness during CR.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-intensity Interval Training Vs. Moderate-intensity Continuous Training For Body Composition. A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis
    Wewege, Michael A.
    van den Berg, Roanna
    Ward, Rachel E.
    Keech, Andrew
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 393 - 393
  • [2] The Effect of High-intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Training on Liver Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sabag, Angelo
    Barr, Loren
    Armour, Mike
    Armstrong, Alex
    Baker, Callum J.
    Twigg, Stephen M.
    Chang, Dennis
    Hackett, Daniel A.
    Keating, Shelley E.
    George, Jacob
    Johnson, Nathan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2022, 107 (03): : 862 - 881
  • [3] The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wewege, M.
    van den Berg, R.
    Ward, R. E.
    Keech, A.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2017, 18 (06) : 635 - 646
  • [4] Effects of High-intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients
    Wagganer, Jason D.
    Miller, William M.
    Syed-Abdul, Majid Mufaqam
    Soni, Dhwani S.
    Hoover, Beverly J.
    McCrate, Mary K.
    Kester, Beverly A.
    Nguyen, Duc T.
    Pujol, Thomas J.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 659 - 659
  • [5] High-Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Women Undergoing Cardiovascular Rehabilitation
    Terada, Tasuku
    Vidal-Almela, Sol
    Reed, Jennifer L.
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 7 (08) : 875 - 875
  • [6] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haohan Yu
    Xudong Zhao
    Xiaoxia Wu
    Jing Yang
    Jun Wang
    Lijuan Hou
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [7] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Haohan
    Zhao, Xudong
    Wu, Xiaoxia
    Yang, Jing
    Wang, Jun
    Hou, Lijuan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [8] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leal, Juliana Moraes
    Galliano, Leony Morgana
    Del Vecchio, Fabricio Boscolo
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [9] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Okamura, Masatsugu
    Shimizu, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Shuhei
    Nishie, Kenichi
    Konishi, Masaaki
    [J]. HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (05) : 1113 - 1128
  • [10] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Juliana Moraes Leal
    Leony Morgana Galliano
    Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio
    [J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2020, 22