Topical cohesion of communities on Twitter

被引:7
|
作者
Gadek, Guillaume [1 ,2 ]
Pauchet, Alexandre [1 ]
Malandain, Nicolas [1 ]
Khelif, Khaled [2 ]
Vercouter, Laurent [1 ]
Brunessaux, Stephan [2 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, INSA Rouen Normandie, LITIS, F-76000 Rouen, France
[2] Airbus, F-78990 Elancourt, France
关键词
Online social network; community detection; measure of community topical cohesion;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.171
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Nowadays, Online Social Networks (OSN) are commonly used by groups of users to communicate. Members of a family, colleagues, fans of a brand, political groups... There is an increasing demand for a precise identification of these groups, coming from brand monitoring, business intelligence and e-reputation management. However, a gap can be observed between the communities detected by many data analytics algorithms on OSN, and effective groups existing in real life: the detected communities often lack of meaning and internal semantic cohesion. Most of existing literature on OSN either focuses on the community detection problem in graphs without considering the topic of the messages exchanged, or concentrates exclusively on the messages without taking into account the social links. In this article, we support the hypothesis that communities extracted on OSN should be topically coherent. We therefore propose a model to represent the groups of interaction on Twitter, the reference on micro-blogging OSN, and two metrics to evaluate the topical cohesion of the detected communities. As an evaluation, we measure the topical cohesion of the groups of users detected by a baseline community detection algorithm. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 593
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Small Number of Communities in Twitter Keyword Networks
    Abraham, Linda
    Bonato, Anthony
    Nazareth, Alexander
    [J]. COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS X, VOL 1, 2022, 1015 : 50 - 61
  • [32] Using interaction networks to map communities on Twitter
    Findlay, Kyle
    van Rensburg, Ockert Janse
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2018, 60 (02) : 169 - 189
  • [33] Examining Online Vaccination Discussion and Communities in Twitter
    Yuan, Xiaoyi
    Crooks, Andrew T.
    [J]. SMSOCIETY'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND SOCIETY, 2018, : 197 - 206
  • [34] Twitter Hashtags for Anesthesiologists: Building Global Communities
    Gai, Nan
    Matava, Clyde
    [J]. A & A PRACTICE, 2019, 12 (02): : 59 - 62
  • [35] Understanding Language Diversity in Local Twitter Communities
    Magdy, Amr
    Ghanem, Thanaa M.
    Musleh, Mashaal
    Mokbel, Mohamed F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM CONFERENCE ON HYPERTEXT AND SOCIAL MEDIA (HT'16), 2016, : 331 - 332
  • [36] Labour migration, communities and perceptions of social cohesion in England
    Andrews, Rhys
    [J]. EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 22 (01) : 77 - 91
  • [37] TRUST AS A COGNITIVE BASE OF SOCIAL COHESION IN THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES
    Nesterova, Marja
    Dielini, Maryna
    Shynkaruk, Lidia
    Yatsenko, Olena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND EDUCATION-IJCRSEE, 2020, 8 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [38] Gated communities as club goods: Segregation or social cohesion?
    Manzi, T
    Smith-Bowers, B
    [J]. HOUSING STUDIES, 2005, 20 (02) : 345 - 359
  • [39] Canons and communities: children and social cohesion in Sweden and the Netherlands
    Stoltz, Pauline
    [J]. EDUCATION CITIZENSHIP AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2011, 6 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [40] Topical differences between Chinese language Twitter and Sina Weibo
    Zhang, Qian
    Goncalves, Bruno
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW'16 COMPANION), 2016, : 625 - 628