OBSERVATION OF ULF ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS BEFORE THE M 7.8 NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF NOVEMBER 13, 2016

被引:1
|
作者
Sahoo, S. K. [1 ]
Katlamudi, M. [1 ]
Lakshmi, G. Udaya [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Seismol Res, Gandhinagar 382009, Gujarat, India
[2] Osmania Univ, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India
来源
GEODYNAMICS & TECTONOPHYSICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
ULF; polarization ratio; fractal dimension; earthquakes; Kp; Dst; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS; CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; GUAM EARTHQUAKE; ALPINE FAULT; ANOMALIES; MECHANISM; EPICENTER; MPGO;
D O I
10.5800/GT-2021-12-4-0561
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We analyzed the ground geomagnetic data obtained from a 3-component fluxgate magnetometer at the Eyrewell Geomagnetic Observatory (New Zealand) (43.474 degrees S, 172.393 degrees E) from October 1 to December 31, 2016. The study aimed to investigate electromagnetic precursors associated with the M 7.8 New Zealand earthquake of November 13, 2016. This earthquake occurred 54 km northeast of Amberley (New Zealand). Its epicenter was located 158 km from the Eyrewell Observatory. We used three methods focused on the polarization ratio, fractal dimension and principal component analysis to identify anomalies in the geomagnetic data. The time series showed an enhanced polarization ratio at two times, October 20 and October 30, 2016, i.e. before the occurrence of the New Zealand earthquake, and a value similar to 1 or more during these instances. Since the global geomagnetic indices Kp and Dst were normal in these cases, the enhanced polarization ratio may be related to the preparation phase of the New Zealand earthquake. To further classify them, we applied the principal component analysis to the magnetic data on component H. The first three principal components showed more than 90 % of the variance of the original ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic field time series. The first principal component was found to be well correlated with the storm index (Dst) recorded during this period. Again, the second principal component was dominated by daily variations, which were the periodic component of the recorded ULF magnetic field. The temporal variation of the third principal component was analyzed to verify a possible correlation between the ULF emissions and the occurrence of the earthquake. The fractal dimension of components D and Z of the magnetic data decreased initially and sharply increased three days before the New Zealand earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 901
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Complex rupture process of the Mw 7.8, 2016, Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand, and its aftershock sequence
    Cesca, S.
    Zhang, Y.
    Mouslopoulou, V.
    Wang, R.
    Saul, J.
    Savage, M.
    Heimann, S.
    Kufner, S. -K.
    Oncken, O.
    Dahm, T.
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 478 : 110 - 120
  • [42] Dynamic triggering of earthquakes in the North Island of New Zealand following the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake
    Yao, Dongdong
    Peng, Zhigang
    Kaneko, Yoshihiro
    Fry, Bill
    Meng, Xiaofeng
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2021, 557
  • [43] Geomorphological Controls on the Distribution of Liquefaction in Blenheim, New Zealand, during the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake
    Bastin, Sarah
    Stringer, Mark E.
    Green, Russell A.
    Wotherspoon, Liam
    van Ballegooy, Sjoerd
    Cox, Brady R.
    Osuchowski, Alex
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V: LIQUEFACTION TRIGGERING, CONSEQUENCES, AND MITIGATION, 2018, (290): : 264 - 272
  • [44] IMPACTS OF SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE ON RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES DURING THE 2016 MW 7.8 KAIKOURA EARTHQUAKE, NEW ZEALAND
    Van Dissen, Russ J.
    Stahl, Timothy
    King, Andrew
    Pettinga, Jarg R.
    Fenton, Clark
    Little, Timothy A.
    Litchfield, Nicola J.
    Stirling, Mark W.
    Langridge, Robert M.
    Nicol, Andrew
    Kearse, Jesse
    Barrell, David J. A.
    Villamor, Pillar
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 52 (01): : 1 - 22
  • [45] Coseismic Contortion and Coupled Nocturnal Ionospheric Perturbations During 2016 Kaikoura, Mw 7.8 New Zealand Earthquake
    Bagiya, Mala S.
    Sunil, P. S.
    Sunil, A. S.
    Ramesh, D. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2018, 123 (02) : 1477 - 1487
  • [46] Spatial-temporal evolution of slow slip movements triggered by the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand
    Jiang, Zhongshan
    Yuan, Linguo
    Huang, Dingfa
    Zhang, Lupeng
    Hassan, Abubakr
    Yang, Zhongrong
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2018, 744 : 72 - 81
  • [47] Preliminary Geometry, Displacement, and Kinematics of Fault Ruptures in the Epicentral Region of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, Earthquake
    Nicol, A.
    Khajavi, N.
    Pettinga, J. R.
    Fenton, C.
    Stahl, T.
    Bannister, S.
    Pedley, K.
    Hyland-Brook, N.
    Bushell, T.
    Hamling, I.
    Ristau, J.
    Noble, D.
    McColl, S. T.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 108 (3B) : 1521 - 1539
  • [48] Source complexity of the 2016 MW7.8 Kaikoura (New Zealand) earthquake revealed from teleseismic and InSAR data
    HaiLin Du
    Xu Zhang
    LiSheng Xu
    WanPeng Feng
    Lei Yi
    Peng Li
    [J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2018, 2 (04) : 310 - 326
  • [49] Stress triggering among faults rupturing during one earthquake: a case study of the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand
    Shan, Bin
    Feng, Yashan
    Liu, Chengli
    Xie, Zujun
    Xiong, Xiong
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (02) : 89 - 91
  • [50] Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand, from Continuous GPS Observations
    Su, Xiaoning
    Meng, Guojie
    Su, Lina
    Wu, Weiwei
    Liu, Tai
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 177 (01) : 285 - 303