Materials and energy assessment in Ceequal transport projects

被引:4
|
作者
Ghumra, Shamir [1 ]
Glass, Jacqui [2 ]
Frost, Matthew W. [2 ]
Watkins, Miles [1 ]
Mundy, Jo [3 ]
机构
[1] Aggregate Ind, Coalville, Leics, England
[2] Univ Loughborough, Dept Civil & Bldg Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England
[3] BRE Global, BREEAM Mat, Watford, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
energy; sustainability; transport planning;
D O I
10.1680/tran.2011.164.3.153
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The growing prominence of sustainability assessment and carbon calculators in the transport sector has led to a greater general awareness of the sustainability issues associated with infrastructure projects. Ceequal, the assessment and awards scheme for improving sustainability in civil engineering and public realm projects, is identified as the leading methodology for assessing such projects in the UK. Ceequal evaluates sustainability by asking questions over 12 sections, including material and energy use, which previous research has identified as important topics for transport projects. This paper presents analysis of 24 Ceequal projects which are transport-related. It shows that high scores in the material use category have a high correlation to overall project scores. Conversely scores in the energy usage section appear to show little relation to overall project performance. An evaluation of road projects within those assessed reveal a number of what can be considered core transport topics and other topics that have little impact on the overall Ceequal score. Therefore recommendations are made for the development of Ceequal, including the rationalisation of material and energy question sets. The methodology outlined in this work could also be extended to the remaining ten Ceequal sections to develop a suite of more specific assessment schemes focused on different categories of civil engineering projects.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE EX-POST ASSESSMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    Griskeviciute-Geciene, Ausrine
    Lazauskaite, Dovile
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 905 - 912
  • [22] A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects
    Karen Lucas
    Ian Philips
    Ersilia Verlinghieri
    Transportation, 2022, 49 : 271 - 291
  • [23] Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects
    Site P.D.
    Filippi F.
    European Transport Research Review, 2009, 1 (4) : 199 - 206
  • [24] Risk Assessment for Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Projects
    Yucelgazi, Fikri
    Yitmen, Ibrahim
    3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [25] A NEW APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS ON URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
    Griskeviciene, Daiva
    Griskevicius, Algirdas
    Griskeviciute-Geciene, Ausrine
    TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL, 2012, 13 (02) : 108 - 122
  • [26] A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects
    Lucas, Karen
    Philips, Ian
    Verlinghieri, Ersilia
    TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 49 (01) : 271 - 291
  • [27] Development of a sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects
    Shortall, Ruth
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Axelsson, Gudni
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 : 28 - 45
  • [28] Methods for Financial Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects: A Review
    Delapedra-Silva, Vanderson
    Ferreira, Paula
    Cunha, Jorge
    Kimura, Herbert
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [29] Consideration and Assessment of Risks in the Planning of Geothermal Energy Projects
    Bauer, Wolfgang
    GEOTHERMISCHE TECHNOLOGIEN: TECHNOLOGIEN ZUR NUTZUNG DER TIEFEN GEOTHERMIE UND IHRE INTEGRATION IN ENERGIEVERSORGUNGSSYSTEME, 2010, 2082 : 53 - 57
  • [30] Risk assessment in renewable energy projects: A case of Russia
    Chebotareva, Galina
    Strielkowski, Wadim
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269