Reflexology: An update of a systematic review of randomised clinical trials

被引:55
|
作者
Ernst, E. [1 ]
Posadzki, P.
Lee, M. S.
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Peninsula Med Sch, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
关键词
Reflexology; Evidence; Effectiveness; Systematic review; Clinical trials; Alternative medicine; LOW-BACK-PAIN; FOOT REFLEXOLOGY; DOUBLE-BLIND; MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; CANCER; INTERVENTION; MANAGEMENT; CARE; REFLEXOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.10.011
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Reflexology is a popular form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The aim of this update is to critically evaluate the evidence for or against the effectiveness of reflexology in patients with any type of medical condition. Six electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Their methodological quality was assessed independently by the two reviewers using the Jadad score. Overall, 23 studies met all inclusion criteria. They related to a wide range of medical conditions. The methodological quality of the RCTs was often poor. Nine high quality RCTs generated negative findings: and five generated positive findings. Eight RCTs suggested that reflexology is effective for the following conditions: diabetes, premenstrual syndrome, cancer patients, multiple sclerosis, symptomatic idiopathic detrusor over-activity and dementia yet important caveats remain. It is concluded that the best clinical evidence does not demonstrate convincingly reflexology to be an effective treatment for any medical condition. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 120
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fesoterodine in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic clinical review of efficacy and safety
    Dell'Utri, Chiara
    Digesu, G. Alessandro
    Bhide, Alka
    Khullar, Vik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (10) : 1337 - 1344
  • [22] Fesoterodine in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic clinical review of efficacy and safety
    Chiara Dell’Utri
    G. Alessandro Digesu
    Alka Bhide
    Vik Khullar
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1337 - 1344
  • [23] A review of randomised clinical trials
    Frase, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 61 (01) : 63 - 64
  • [24] A review of randomised clinical trials
    Werner Frase
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005, 61 : 63 - 64
  • [25] The effects of reflexology on symptoms in pregnancy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Liang, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Shangping
    Li, Ke
    Zhang, Haolin
    Yang, Fujing
    Wang, Xinhui
    Yang, Guangyi
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)
  • [26] Acupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Tae-Young Choi
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Tae-Hun Kim
    Christopher Zaslawski
    Edzard Ernst
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012, 20 : 1147 - 1158
  • [27] Benefits and harms of placebo in surgical randomised clinical trials: a systematic review
    Karolina Wartolowska
    Andrew Judge
    Benjamin Dean
    Ines Rombach
    Julian Savulescu
    David Beard
    Andrew Carr
    [J]. Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [28] A systematic review of randomised clinical trials of Tripterygium wilfordii for rheumatoid arthritis
    Canter, P. H.
    Lee, Hyang Sook
    Ernst, E.
    [J]. PHYTOMEDICINE, 2006, 13 (05) : 371 - 377
  • [29] A systematic review of subgroup analyses in randomised clinical trials in cardiovascular disease
    Brand, Korbinian J.
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Haller, Bernhard
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [30] Ukrain – a new cancer cure? A systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    E Ernst
    K Schmidt
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 5