Reflexology: An update of a systematic review of randomised clinical trials

被引:55
|
作者
Ernst, E. [1 ]
Posadzki, P.
Lee, M. S.
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Peninsula Med Sch, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
关键词
Reflexology; Evidence; Effectiveness; Systematic review; Clinical trials; Alternative medicine; LOW-BACK-PAIN; FOOT REFLEXOLOGY; DOUBLE-BLIND; MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; CANCER; INTERVENTION; MANAGEMENT; CARE; REFLEXOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.10.011
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Reflexology is a popular form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The aim of this update is to critically evaluate the evidence for or against the effectiveness of reflexology in patients with any type of medical condition. Six electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Their methodological quality was assessed independently by the two reviewers using the Jadad score. Overall, 23 studies met all inclusion criteria. They related to a wide range of medical conditions. The methodological quality of the RCTs was often poor. Nine high quality RCTs generated negative findings: and five generated positive findings. Eight RCTs suggested that reflexology is effective for the following conditions: diabetes, premenstrual syndrome, cancer patients, multiple sclerosis, symptomatic idiopathic detrusor over-activity and dementia yet important caveats remain. It is concluded that the best clinical evidence does not demonstrate convincingly reflexology to be an effective treatment for any medical condition. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 120
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条