A multiple criteria decision making framework for regional aquaculture development

被引:22
|
作者
El-Gayar, OF
Leung, P
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Inst Grad Studies Res, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Biosyst Engn, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
multiple criteria decision making; multiple objective programming; compromise programming; goal programming; aquaculture development;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00183-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aquaculture development is considered as a viable sourer for providing high quality cheap protein, particularly, for developing countries where protein shortage already exists. However, complexities in such development planning can be difficult without the aid of modern decision-aids such as multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) models. MCDM models are already in use in the business and manufacturing sectors. However, their use in agriculture is limited and their use in aquaculture is almost nonexistent. This paper presents a MCDM framework for the planning of regional aquaculture development. The MCDM model seeks a desirable allocation of resources and activity levels that strikes an acceptable balance among the various development goals under consideration subject to resource constraints, market constraints, and pollution constraints. To accommodate different decision situations, three different MCDM solution techniques are implemented, namely, multiple objective programming (MOP, compromise programming (CP), and weighted goal programming (WGP). The applicability of the framework is demonstrated through applying it to a case study from northern Egypt where aquaculture is a viable industry for supplying cheap and good quality protein, balancing the foreign exchange deficits, and creating employment opportunities. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 482
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - THE CASE FOR INTERDEPENDENCE
    CARLSSON, C
    FULLER, R
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [42] MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING IN THE USSR - A SURVEY
    OZERNOY, VM
    [J]. NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1988, 35 (06) : 543 - 566
  • [43] Preface: multiple criteria decision making for sustainable decisions
    Sarah Ben Amor
    Anissa Frini
    Gilles Reinhardt
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 293 : 401 - 403
  • [44] Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Multiobjective Optimization - A Toolbox
    Kaliszewski, Ignacy
    Miroforidis, Janusz
    Podkopaev, Dmitry
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY AND IMPRECISION IN DECISION MAKING AND DECISION SUPPORT: CROSS-FERTILIZATION, NEW MODELS, AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 559 : 135 - 142
  • [45] System dynamics and multiple-criteria decision making
    Gottschalk, Petter
    [J]. SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 1986, 2 (01) : 67 - 67
  • [46] PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Kou, Gang
    Ergu, Daji
    Lin, Changsheng
    Chen, Yang
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2016, 22 (05) : 738 - 765
  • [47] Application of multiple criteria decision making for network improvement
    Tzeng, GH
    Tsaur, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 1997, 31 (01) : 49 - 74
  • [48] A bibliometric analysis of research on multiple criteria decision making
    Yu, Dejian
    Wang, Wanru
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Zhang, Shuai
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2018, 114 (04): : 747 - 758
  • [49] Multiple criteria decision making and economics: an introduction PREFACE
    Caballero, Rafael
    Romero, Carlos
    Ruiz, Francisco
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 245 (1-2) : 1 - 5
  • [50] Fuzzy techniques for multiple criteria decision making in GIS
    Morris, A
    Jankowski, P
    [J]. JOINT 9TH IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND 20TH NAFIPS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS. 1-5, 2001, : 2376 - 2381