Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins

被引:300
|
作者
Labropoulos, N [1 ]
Tiongson, J [1 ]
Pryor, L [1 ]
Tassiopoulos, AK [1 ]
Kang, SS [1 ]
Mansour, MA [1 ]
Baker, WH [1 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00424-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This prospective study was designed to determine the upper limits of normal for duration and maximum velocity of retrograde flow (RF) in lower extremity veins. Methods: Eighty limbs in 40 healthy subjects and 60 limbs in 45 patients with chronic venous disease were examined with duplex scanning in the standing and supine positions. Each limb was assessed for reflux at 16 venous sites, including the common femoral, deep femoral, and proximal and distal femoral veins; proximal and distal popliteal veins; gastrocnemial vein; anterior and posterior tibial veins; peroneal vein; greater saphenous vein, at the saphenofemoral junction, thigh, upper calf, and lower calf; and lesser saphenous vein, at the saphenopopliteal junction and mid-calf. Perforator veins along the course of these veins were also assessed. In the healthy volunteers, 1553 vein segments were assessed, including 480 superficial vein segments, 800 deep vein segments, and 273 perforator vein segments; and in the patients, 1272 vein segments were assessed, including 360 superficial vein segments, 600 deep vein segments, and 312 perforator vein segments. Detection and measurement of reflux were performed at duplex scanning. Standard pneumatic cuff compression pressure was used to elicit reflux. Duration of RE and peak vein velocity were measured immediately after release of compression. Results: Duration of RE in the superficial veins ranged from 0 to 2400 ms (mean, 210 ms), and was less than 500 ms in 96.7% of these veins. In the perforator veins, regardless of location, outward flow ranged from 0 to 760 ms (mean, 170 ms), and was less than 350 ms in 97% of these veins. In the deep veins, RF ranged from 0 to 2600 ms. Mean RF in the deep femoral veins and calf veins was 190 ms, and was less than 500 ms in 97.6% of these veins. In the femoropopliteal veins, mean RF was 390 ms, and ranged from 510 to 2600 ms in 21 of 400 segments; however, RF was less than 990 ms in 99% of these veins. Duration of RF was significantly longer in all three veins systems in patients (P < .0001 for all comparisons). With a cutoff value of more than 1000 ms rather than more than 500 ms, prevalence of abnormal RF in the femoropopliteal veins was significantly reduced, from 29% to 18% (P = .002). Thirty-seven vein segments (2.4%) had RF greater than 500 ms in the supine position, compared with less than 500 ms in 22 of these vein segments (59%) in the standing position. Of the 48 vein segments (3.1%) with RF greater than 500 ms in the standing position, RF was less than 500 ms in 6 of these vein segments (13%) in the supine position. Similar observations were noted in patient veins. There was no association between RF and peak vein velocity. Peak vein velocity had no significance in determining reflux. Conclusions: The cutoff value for reflux in the superficial and deep calf veins is greater than 500 ms. However, the reflux cutoff value for the femoropopliteal veins should be greater than 1000 ms. Outward flow in the perforating veins should be considered abnormal at greater than 350 ms. Reflux testing should be performed with the patient standing.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 798
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RADIONUCLIDE VENOGRAPHY (RNV) IN LOWER-EXTREMITY VENOUS DISEASE
    HENKIN, RE
    YAO, JST
    QUINN, JL
    BERGAN, JJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1974, 15 (03) : 171 - 175
  • [42] External Valvuloplasty for Subcutaneous Small Veins to Prevent Venous Reflux in Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema
    Akita, Shinsuke
    Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki
    Kuriyama, Motone
    Hasegawa, Masakazu
    Kubota, Yoshitaka
    Koizumi, Tomoe
    Ishigaki, Tatsuya
    Tokumoto, Hideki
    Satoh, Kaneshige
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (04) : 1008 - 1014
  • [43] The strong but nonspecific relationship between 18F-FDG uptake in the lower-extremity veins and venous thromboembolism
    Zhu, Hongyun June
    Hess, Soren
    Rubello, Domenico
    Goris, Michael L.
    Alavi, Abass
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 37 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [44] Enhanced Perception of Deoxygenated Hemoglobin for the Visualization of Lower-Extremity Reticular Veins
    Friedmann, Daniel P.
    Verma, Kritin K.
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2024, 50 (02) : 207 - 209
  • [45] A NEW METHOD OF ASSESSMENT OF BLOOD-FLOW IN LOWER-EXTREMITY VEINS
    LYTKIN, MI
    VEDENSKI, AN
    STOIKO, YM
    SINGAEVSKI, AB
    VESTNIK KHIRURGII IMENI I I GREKOVA, 1990, 144 (02): : 115 - 117
  • [46] Development of a research agenda for endovenous treatment of lower-extremity venous reflux: Proceedings from a multidisciplinary consensus panel
    Vedantham, S
    Rundback, JH
    Khilnani, NM
    Gloviczki, P
    Andrews, RT
    Sadick, NS
    Fan, CM
    Meissner, MH
    Comerota, AJ
    Hume, KM
    Chrisman, HB
    Pavcnik, D
    Kaufman, JA
    Min, RJ
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (12) : 1575 - 1579
  • [47] Long-term results of lower-extremity venous injuries
    Bermudez, KM
    Knudson, MM
    Nelken, NA
    Shackleford, S
    Dean, CL
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1997, 132 (09) : 963 - 967
  • [48] TOURNIQUET PRESSURE (TP) AND LOWER-EXTREMITY VENOUS FLOW DYNAMICS
    VERMA, RC
    WEBBER, MM
    EISENMAN, JI
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1979, 20 (06) : 639 - 639
  • [49] SCINTIGRAPHIC DEMONSTRATION OF LOWER-EXTREMITY PERIOSTITIS SECONDARY TO VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
    GENSBURG, RS
    KAWASHIMA, A
    SANDLER, CM
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1988, 29 (07) : 1279 - 1282
  • [50] PHLEBOGRAPHIC SIGNS IN FRESH POSTOPERATIVE VENOUS THROMBOSIS OF LOWER-EXTREMITY
    ZACHRISSON, BE
    JANSEN, H
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1973, 14 (01): : 82 - 96