Macroscopic spray performance of alternative and conventional jet fuels at non-reacting, elevated ambient conditions

被引:17
|
作者
Kannaiyan, Kumaran [1 ]
Sadr, Reza [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Qatar, Mech Engn, Doha 23874, Qatar
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Alternative jet fuels; Gas-to-Liquid jet fuel; Macroscopic spray; Shadowgraph; Liquid sheet dynamics; FISCHER-TROPSCH FUEL; ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; IGNITION DELAY; GAS; NANOPARTICLES; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; ENGINE; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117023
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Gas-to-liquid (GTL) jet fuel, a liquid fuel synthesized from natural gas, has recently gained significant global attention due to its cleaner combustion characteristics when compared to the conventional jet fuels. The critical physical and chemical properties of GTL fuels are different from those of the conventional fuels, which in turn, influence the atomization, combustion, and eventually, the emission characteristics of the fuel in a jet engine. To this end, this work investigates the non-reacting near-nozzle spray performance of GTL and conventional Jet A-1 fuels using a pressure-swirl nozzle at elevated ambient conditions, which are relevant to practical combustors in a jet engine. The macroscopic spray features, such as spray cone angle, liquid sheet dynamics, and the sheet velocity, are determined using the high-speed imaging and shadowgraph technique. The ambient gas pressure is varied from 100 to 1300 kPa, and the ambient gas temperature is varied from 300 to 375 K, while the pressure difference across the nozzle is kept constant, in order to study their effect on the spray characteristics. The results show that the ambient gas pressure has a significant impact on the spray dynamics when compared to that of the ambient gas temperature, in the range examined in this work. The comparison of macroscopic spray results between the conventional and alternative jet fuels shows that the far-field spray cone angle for the GTL jet fuel is higher than those of the Jet A-1 fuel. Furthermore, in the near nozzle region, the sheet breakup region for the GTL jet fuel is slightly longer than that of the conventional fuel under the conditions studied.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Spray characteristics of natural gas-based alternative jet fuel at high pressure ambient conditions
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. FUEL, 2023, 350
  • [22] Macroscopic spray characteristics and breakup performance of dimethyl ether (DME) fuel at high fuel temperatures and ambient conditions
    Park, Su Han
    Kim, Hyung Jun
    Lee, Chang Sik
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 (10) : 3001 - 3011
  • [23] Experimental diesel spray characterization of the medium-duty injector with single- and multi-hole nozzle configurations under non-reacting, non-vaporizing conditions
    Park, Ji-Woong
    Jouzdani, Shirin
    Tzanetakis, Tom
    Schmidt, Henry
    Atkinson, William
    Naber, Jeffrey
    Pei, Yuanjiang
    Tao, Feng
    Garg, Rajesh
    Langenderfer, David
    Zhang, Yu
    Som, Sibendu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-SWITZERLAND, 2022, 8
  • [24] Auto-ignition characteristics of conventional and synthetic alternative jet fuels in a motored engine and an optically accessible constant volume spray combustion chamber
    Kang, Dongil
    Kaslaskar, Vickey
    Boehman, Andre
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [25] Optical investigation on impacts of ambient pressure on macroscopic spray characteristics of ducted fuel injection under non-vaporizing conditions
    Li, Feng
    Lee, Chia-fon
    Wang, Ziman
    Liu, Fushui
    Lu, Guoxiang
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 268