Macroscopic spray performance of alternative and conventional jet fuels at non-reacting, elevated ambient conditions

被引:17
|
作者
Kannaiyan, Kumaran [1 ]
Sadr, Reza [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Qatar, Mech Engn, Doha 23874, Qatar
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Alternative jet fuels; Gas-to-Liquid jet fuel; Macroscopic spray; Shadowgraph; Liquid sheet dynamics; FISCHER-TROPSCH FUEL; ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; IGNITION DELAY; GAS; NANOPARTICLES; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; ENGINE; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117023
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Gas-to-liquid (GTL) jet fuel, a liquid fuel synthesized from natural gas, has recently gained significant global attention due to its cleaner combustion characteristics when compared to the conventional jet fuels. The critical physical and chemical properties of GTL fuels are different from those of the conventional fuels, which in turn, influence the atomization, combustion, and eventually, the emission characteristics of the fuel in a jet engine. To this end, this work investigates the non-reacting near-nozzle spray performance of GTL and conventional Jet A-1 fuels using a pressure-swirl nozzle at elevated ambient conditions, which are relevant to practical combustors in a jet engine. The macroscopic spray features, such as spray cone angle, liquid sheet dynamics, and the sheet velocity, are determined using the high-speed imaging and shadowgraph technique. The ambient gas pressure is varied from 100 to 1300 kPa, and the ambient gas temperature is varied from 300 to 375 K, while the pressure difference across the nozzle is kept constant, in order to study their effect on the spray characteristics. The results show that the ambient gas pressure has a significant impact on the spray dynamics when compared to that of the ambient gas temperature, in the range examined in this work. The comparison of macroscopic spray results between the conventional and alternative jet fuels shows that the far-field spray cone angle for the GTL jet fuel is higher than those of the Jet A-1 fuel. Furthermore, in the near nozzle region, the sheet breakup region for the GTL jet fuel is slightly longer than that of the conventional fuel under the conditions studied.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Effects of nanoscale fuel additives on properties and non-reacting spray performance of alternative, conventional and blended jet fuels at elevated ambient conditions
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    AlDosari, AlReem
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 208
  • [2] Microscopic spray measurements of non-reacting alternative jet fuel: Effect of ambient gas temperature
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 294
  • [3] Macroscopic non-reacting spray characterization of gasoline compression ignition fuels in a constant volume chamber
    Du, Jianguo
    Mohan, Balaji
    Sim, Jaeheon
    Fang, Tiegang
    Roberts, William L.
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 255
  • [4] SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF ALTERNATIVE JET FUEL AT ELEVATED AMBIENT CONDITIONS
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 3, 2019,
  • [5] Influence of fuel characteristics on the alternative jet fuel atomization at non-reacting conditions
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. FUEL, 2024, 357
  • [6] LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF A TURBULENT NON-REACTING SPRAY JET
    Hu, B.
    Banerjee, S.
    Liu, K.
    Rajamohan, D.
    Deur, J. M.
    Xue, Q.
    Som, S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE DIVISION FALL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 2, 2016,
  • [7] Direct numerical simulation on supersonic turbulent reacting and non-reacting spray jet in heated coflow
    Jin, Tai
    Luo, Kun
    Dai, Qi
    Fan, Jianren
    [J]. FUEL, 2016, 164 : 267 - 276
  • [8] Performance analysis of a vortex chamber under non-reacting and reacting conditions
    T N Rajesh
    T J S Jothi
    T Jayachandran
    [J]. Sādhanā, 2020, 45
  • [9] Performance analysis of a vortex chamber under non-reacting and reacting conditions
    Rajesh, T. N.
    Jothi, T. J. S.
    Jayachandran, T.
    [J]. SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2020, 45 (01):
  • [10] Influence of Nanoparticles on Spray Performance of Alternative Jet Fuels
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 3, 2016,