Biomass logistics as a determinant of second-generation biofuel facility scale, location and technology selection

被引:43
|
作者
Stephen, James D. [1 ]
Mabee, Warren E. [2 ]
Saddler, Jack N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2010年 / 4卷 / 05期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
biomass logistics; scaling; second-generation biofuels; biorefinery; forest biomass; FT TRANSPORTATION FUELS; FAST PYROLYSIS; MOISTURE-CONTENT; PLANT SIZE; BIO-OIL; ETHANOL; COST; EFFICIENCY; GASIFICATION; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.239
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Feedstock logistics, as dictated by biomass physical properties, location, and distribution, as well as transportation infrastructure, were shown to be a primary determinant of the scale, location, and technology selection of any future biorefineries. The maximum capacity of both biochemical-and thermochemical-based second-generation biofuel facilities was established based on feedstock logistics including delivery mode (road, rail, or ship), maximum number of deliveries by mode, feedstock type (whole logs, chips, pellets, or bio-oil), and biofuel yield from those feedstocks. The world's largest ethanol plant, pulp mill, coal-based power plant, and oil refinery were used to approximate maximum plant size for different technologies, and to set an upper limit on the number of deliveries logistically possible for each transport mode. It was apparent that thermochemical conversion to transportation biofuels was favored for large, multimodal coastal facilities that are able to receive imported biomass in the form of feedstock intermediates, such as pellets and bio-oil (maximum capacities of 2844 and 6001 million liters gasoline equivalent (MLGE) respectively). Biochemically-based conversion processes, primarily due to smaller economies of scale and the typical use of higher moisture content and undensified feedstocks, such as whole logs and chips, are better suited for smaller facilities (maximum 1405 and 1542 MLGE, respectively) that rely on local feedstocks delivered by truck and/or rail. It was also apparent that optimization of the feedstock-intermediate-product chain, including biomass densification for transportation and high conversion yield, is essential if the scale of the any second-generation biofuels facility is to be maximized. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 518
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects on forest products markets of second-generation biofuel production based on biomass from boreal forests: a case study from Norway
    Chudy, Rafal P.
    Sjolie, Hanne K.
    Latta, Greg S.
    Solberg, Birger
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (03) : 218 - 227
  • [32] Technology selection for rice straw-based second-generation bioethanol production in West Java']Java
    Gozan, M.
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (ICOGEE 2020), 2020, 599
  • [33] A GIS-based method for identifying the optimal location for a facility to convert forest biomass to biofuel
    Zhang, Fengli
    Johnson, Dana M.
    Sutherland, John W.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (09): : 3951 - 3961
  • [34] Effect of harvest region shape, biomass yield, and plant location on optimal biofuel facility size
    Jenkins, Timothy L.
    Jin, Enze
    Sutherland, John W.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 111
  • [35] Cellulose solvent-based pretreatment for enhanced second-generation biofuel production: a review
    Satari, Behzad
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Kumar, Rajeev
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 3 (01): : 11 - 62
  • [36] Renewable Energy Potential: Second-Generation Biomass as Feedstock for Bioethanol Production
    Igwebuike, Chidiebere Millicent
    Awad, Sary
    Andres, Yves
    MOLECULES, 2024, 29 (07):
  • [37] The global energy challenge: second-generation feedstocks on marginal lands for a sustainable biofuel production
    Russo, Claudio
    Cirillo, Valerio
    Pollaro, Nausicaa
    Terribile, Fabio
    Chiodini, Andrea
    Maggio, Albino
    CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [38] The interaction between EU biofuel policy and first- and second-generation biodiesel production
    Boutesteijn, Coen
    Drabik, Dugan
    Venus, Thomas J.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2017, 106 : 124 - 129
  • [39] Epoxidation of Camelina sativa oil methyl esters as a second-generation biofuel with thermodynamic calculations
    Hajek, Martin
    Kocian, David
    Hajek, Tomas
    Lukes, Vladimir
    Klein, Erik
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 228
  • [40] "A future beyond sugar": Examining second-generation biofuel pathways in Alagoas, northeast Brazil
    Kirshner, Joshua
    Brown, Eleanor
    Dunlop, Lynda
    Redeker, Kelly
    Veneu, Fernanda
    Brooks, Sally
    Kirshner, Shannon
    Walton, Paul H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 44