MOVES Versus MOBILE Comparison of Greenhouse Gas and Criterion Pollutant Emissions

被引:29
|
作者
Vallamsundar, Suriya [1 ]
Lin, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Mat Engn, Inst Environm Sci & Policy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2233-04
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a new generation regulatory mobile emission model, called MOVES (motor vehicle emission simulator), to replace its current emission models, MOBILE and NON ROAD. On its formal adoption, MOVES will have important implications for regional mobile emission inventories, particularly concerning transportation conformity to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment. MOVES will not only improve emissions inventory estimates, but it will also expand the capabilities to perform quantitative project-level emission inventories that are not possible with the latest version of MOBILE. MOVES is designed to estimate emissions at scales ranging from individual roads and intersections to county-, region-, and nationwide. The first objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive documentation of the differences between MOVES and MOBILE in terms of model methodology, scope, and features. The second objective is to till the void in the literature on the comparison of MOVES and MOBILE at the regional level through a real-world case study. Using Cook County in Illinois, the authors compared emission estimates of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the latest versions of both models. For this purpose, consistent local specific input data are incorporated into the models. The third objective is to provide insights on input data requirements for MOVES to practitioners and metropolitan planning organizations to facilitate their transition from MOBILE to MOVES in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Changes in European greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions 1960-2010: decomposition of determining factors
    Rafaj, Peter
    Amann, Markus
    Siri, Jose
    Wuester, Henning
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 124 (03) : 477 - 504
  • [42] Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions of China's Residential Sector: The Importance of Considering Energy Transition
    Xing, Rui
    Hanaoka, Tatsuya
    Kanamori, Yuko
    Masui, Toshihiko
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [43] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Electric Vehicles in the United States
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Han, Jeongwoo
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE POWERTRAINS, 2013, 2 (02) : 325 - 336
  • [44] Reasonable emissions of greenhouse gases: efficient abatement for a stock pollutant
    Chang, Howard F.
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2007, 155 (06) : 1869 - 1874
  • [45] A modeling comparison of deep greenhouse gas emissions reduction scenarios by 2030 in California
    Yeh, Sonia
    Yang, Christopher
    Gibbs, Michael
    Roland-Holst, David
    Greenblatt, Jeffery
    Mahone, Amber
    Wei, Dan
    Brinkman, Gregory
    Cunningham, Joshua
    Eggert, Anthony
    Haley, Ben
    Hart, Elaine
    Williams, Jim
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2016, 13-14 : 169 - 180
  • [46] Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation Strategies
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Honan, Mallory
    Roque, Breanna
    Tricarico, Juan
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 195 - 195
  • [47] Companies report greenhouse gas emissions
    Waste Age, 2000, 31 (05):
  • [48] The Cost of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Gillingham, Kenneth
    Stock, James H.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 32 (04): : 53 - 72
  • [49] CHINA GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS
    SMIL, V
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1994, 4 (04): : 325 - 332
  • [50] Hiding greenhouse gas emissions in the cloud
    David Mytton
    Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10 : 701 - 701