MOVES Versus MOBILE Comparison of Greenhouse Gas and Criterion Pollutant Emissions

被引:29
|
作者
Vallamsundar, Suriya [1 ]
Lin, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Mat Engn, Inst Environm Sci & Policy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2233-04
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a new generation regulatory mobile emission model, called MOVES (motor vehicle emission simulator), to replace its current emission models, MOBILE and NON ROAD. On its formal adoption, MOVES will have important implications for regional mobile emission inventories, particularly concerning transportation conformity to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment. MOVES will not only improve emissions inventory estimates, but it will also expand the capabilities to perform quantitative project-level emission inventories that are not possible with the latest version of MOBILE. MOVES is designed to estimate emissions at scales ranging from individual roads and intersections to county-, region-, and nationwide. The first objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive documentation of the differences between MOVES and MOBILE in terms of model methodology, scope, and features. The second objective is to till the void in the literature on the comparison of MOVES and MOBILE at the regional level through a real-world case study. Using Cook County in Illinois, the authors compared emission estimates of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the latest versions of both models. For this purpose, consistent local specific input data are incorporated into the models. The third objective is to provide insights on input data requirements for MOVES to practitioners and metropolitan planning organizations to facilitate their transition from MOBILE to MOVES in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The contribution of asynchronous loads to pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions
    Muzi, Francesco
    Passacantando, Luigi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD IASME/WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT III, 2008, : 336 - +
  • [2] Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions from Composting
    Nordahl, Sarah L.
    Preble, Chelsea V.
    Kirchstetter, Thomas W.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (06) : 2235 - 2247
  • [4] Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from power barges (powerships)
    Marais, Eloise A.
    Akker, Orianna
    Wiedinmyer, Christine
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ADVANCES, 2022, 1 (02): : 164 - 169
  • [5] Future Greenhouse Gas and Local Pollutant Emissions for India: Policy Links and Disjoints
    Amit Garg
    P.R. Shukla
    Debyani Ghosh
    Manmohan Kapshe
    Nair Rajesh
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8 (1) : 71 - 92
  • [6] Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [7] Allocating greenhouse gas emissions among countries with mobile populations
    Hoel, M
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2002, : 84 - 97
  • [8] Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Cooperative of Recycling of Materials
    Longo, G. L.
    Nunes, A. O.
    Barrios, C. C.
    Paiva, J. M. F.
    Moris, V. A. S.
    REVISTA VIRTUAL DE QUIMICA, 2019, 11 (01) : 190 - 209
  • [9] A Comparison of Policy Instruments to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Freebairn, John
    ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2016, 35 (03): : 204 - 215
  • [10] Carbon Price versus Subsidies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Freebairn, John
    ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2014, 33 (03): : 233 - 242