The Optimal Design of Bifactor Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing with Mixed-format Items

被引:6
|
作者
Mao, Xiuzhen [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [2 ]
Xin, Tao [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
multidimensional computerized adaptive testing; bifactor model; mixed-format design; item selection; bifactor dimension reduction; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; SELECTION; INFORMATION; SCALE; CAT;
D O I
10.1177/01466216221108382
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing (MCAT) using mixed-format items holds great potential for the next-generation assessments. Two critical factors in the mixed-format test design (i.e., the order and proportion of polytomous items) and item selection were addressed in the context of mixed-format bifactor MCAT. For item selection, this article presents the derivation of the Fisher information matrix of the bifactor graded response model and the application of the bifactor dimension reduction method to simplify the computation of the mutual information (MI) item selection method. In a simulation study, different MCAT designs were compared with varying proportions of polytomous items (0.2-0.6, 1), different item-delivering formats (DPmix: delivering polytomous items at the final stage; RPmix: random delivering), three bifactor patterns (low, middle, and high), and two item selection methods (Bayesian D-optimality and MI). Simulation results suggested that a) the overall estimation precision increased with a higher bifactor pattern; b) the two item selection methods did not show substantial differences in estimation precision; and c) the RPmix format always led to more precise interim and final estimates than the DPmix format. The proportions of 0.3 and 0.4 were recommended for the RPmix and DPmix formats, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 621
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items
    van Rijn, PW
    Eggen, TJHM
    Hemker, BT
    Sanders, PF
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 26 (04) : 393 - 411
  • [32] Reducing the Impact of Inappropriate Items on Reviewable Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Yen, Yung-Chin
    Ho, Rong-Guey
    Liao, Wen-Wei
    Chen, Li-Ju
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (02): : 231 - 243
  • [33] Computerized adaptive testing for testlet-based innovative items
    Kang, Hyeon-Ah
    Han, Suhwa
    Betts, Joe
    Muntean, William
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 75 (01): : 136 - 157
  • [34] Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Wei, Hua
    Lin, Jie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2015, 15 (01) : 50 - 70
  • [35] Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomously Scored Items
    Gao, Xuliang
    Wang, Daxun
    Cai, Yan
    Tu, Dongbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2020, 37 (03) : 709 - 729
  • [37] A LASSO-Based Method for Detecting Item-Trait Patterns of Replenished Items in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Sun, Jianan
    Ye, Ziwen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [38] Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model
    Wang, Qin
    Zheng, Yi
    Liu, Kai
    Cai, Yan
    Peng, Siwei
    Tu, Dongbo
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (02) : 600 - 614
  • [39] Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model
    Qin Wang
    Yi Zheng
    Kai Liu
    Yan Cai
    Siwei Peng
    Dongbo Tu
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2024, 56 : 600 - 614
  • [40] Applying multidimensional computerized adaptive testing to the MSQOL-54
    Giordano, Andrea
    Testa, Silvia
    Bassi, Marta
    Cilia, Sabina
    Bertolotto, Antonio
    Quartuccio, Maria Esmeralda
    Pietrolongo, Erika
    Falautano, Monica
    Grobberio, Monica
    Niccolai, Claudia
    Allegri, Beatrice
    Viterbo, Rosa Gemma
    Confalonieri, Paolo
    Giovannetti, Ambra Mara
    Cocco, Eleonora
    Grasso, Maria Grazia
    Lugaresi, Alessandra
    Ferriani, Elisa
    Nocentini, Ugo
    Zaffaroni, Mauro
    De Livera, Alysha
    Jelinek, George
    Solari, Alessandra
    Rosato, Rosalba
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S89 - S90