Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:2
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to Individual Student Performance in a Team-Based Simulation
    Daulton, Brittany J.
    Romito, Laura
    Weber, Zach
    Burba, Jennifer
    Ahmed, Rami A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 8
  • [22] Getting a Head Start: High-Fidelity, Simulation-Based Operating Room Team Training of Interprofessional Students
    Paige, John T.
    Garbee, Deborah D.
    Kozmenko, Valeriy
    Yu, Qingzhao
    Kozmenko, Lyubov
    Yang, Tong
    Bonanno, Laura
    Swartz, William
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (01) : 140 - 149
  • [23] Non-operating room anaesthesia and difficult airway management in a case of ectopic lingual thyroid planned for magnetic resonance imaging
    Agarwal, Rishabh
    Khan, Atif
    Dhar, Mridul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (04) : 343 - 345
  • [24] Neonatal airway management training using simulation-based educational methods and technology
    Yousef, Nadya
    Soghier, Lamia
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 47 (07)
  • [25] Proactive Evaluation of an Operating Room Prototype: A Simulation-Based Modeling Approach
    Taaffe, Kevin
    Joseph, Anjali
    Khoshkenar, Amin
    Machry, Herminia
    Allison, David
    Reeves, Scott T.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (08) : E1833 - E1839
  • [26] Simulation-Based Mock-Up Evaluation of a Universal Operating Room
    Shultz, Jonas
    Borkenhagen, David
    Rose, Emily
    Gribbons, Brendan
    Rusak-Gillrie, Hannah
    Fleck, Shelly
    Muniak, Allison
    Filer, John
    HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (01) : 68 - 80
  • [27] Interdisciplinary Simulation Based Training for the Operating Room Team - a Systematic Review
    Rathore, A.
    Lennox, L.
    Bickerton, M.
    Baliga, S.
    Gardner, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [28] Meeting Code Blue Requirements Using a Team-Based Simulation
    Billings, Diane M.
    Kowalski, Karren
    Nelson, Leslie S.
    Aguirri, Amanda B.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2020, 51 (05): : 205 - 208
  • [29] A TEAM-BASED MODEL OF CARE FOR MANAGEMENT OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION
    Faubion, S.
    Rullo, J.
    Hartzell, R.
    Cohen, D.
    Goldstein, S.
    Frohmader, K.
    Mara, K.
    Schroeder, D.
    Goldstein, I
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (06): : E354 - E354
  • [30] Team Play in Surgical Education: A Simulation-Based Study
    Marr, Mollie
    Hemmert, Keith
    Nguyen, Andrew H.
    Combs, Ronnie
    Annamalai, Alagappan
    Miller, George
    Pachter, H. Leon
    Turner, James
    Rifkind, Kenneth
    Cohen, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (01) : 63 - 69