Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:2
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulation-based team training in the operating room
    Jensen, Lisbet
    Jensen, Anette
    Rasmussen, Dorte Due
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 61 (08) : 1052 - 1053
  • [2] Simulation-based evaluation of operating room management policies
    Jan Schoenfelder
    Sebastian Kohl
    Manuel Glaser
    Sebastian McRae
    Jens O. Brunner
    Thomas Koperna
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [3] Simulation-based evaluation of operating room management policies
    Schoenfelder, Jan
    Kohl, Sebastian
    Glaser, Manuel
    McRae, Sebastian
    Brunner, Jens O.
    Koperna, Thomas
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Improving Postpartum Hemorrhage Outcomes With Team-Based Simulation of Operating Room Transfers
    Levit, Elizabeth
    Marko, Emily K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 98S - 98S
  • [5] Non-operating room emergency airway management and tracheal intubation: A prospective tracheal intubation study
    LaBerge, TP
    Loushin, MK
    Hasinoff, IK
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (03) : B26 - B26
  • [6] Effect of simulation-based team training in airway management: a systematic review
    Nielsen, R. P.
    Nikolajsen, L.
    Paltved, C.
    Aagaard, R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 (10) : 1404 - 1415
  • [7] Design and Impact of an Intraoperative Pathway: A New Operating Room Model for Team-Based Practice
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Yueh, Janet H.
    Bar-Meir, Eran D.
    Darrah, Ly M.
    Guglielmi, Charlotte L.
    Wood, Elizabeth R.
    Carr, Justine M.
    Moorman, Donald W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (06) : 865 - 873
  • [8] Airway management in a pediatric patient with glottic web: An anesthetic challenge in non-operating room anesthesia
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Narayanan, Balakrishnan
    Dang, Deepanshu
    Kumari, Kamlesh
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 40 (02) : 363 - 364
  • [9] Effect of Interprofessional Crisis Simulation Training in a Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Setting on Team Coordination: A Mixed Methods Study
    Schroeck, Hedwig
    Hatton, Bridget
    Martinez-Camblor, Pablo
    Whitty, Michaela A.
    Wen, Louise
    Taenzer, Andreas H.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2025, 51 (02): : 115 - 125
  • [10] High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisciplinary operating room team training at the point of care
    Paige, John T.
    Kozmenko, Valeriy
    Yang, Tong
    Gururaja, Ramanarayan Paragi
    Hilton, Charles W.
    Cohn, Isidore, Jr.
    Chauvin, Sheila W.
    SURGERY, 2009, 145 (02) : 138 - 146