Propofol versus Fentanyl for Sedation in Pediatric Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
|
作者
Gunathilaka, P. K. G. [1 ]
Jat, Kana Ram [1 ]
Sankar, Jhuma [1 ]
Lodha, Rakesh [1 ]
Kabra, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pediat, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Conscious sedation; Endoscopy; Ramsay score; Visual analog scale; CTRI; 2016; 09; 007307; FLEXIBLE BRONCHOSCOPY; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; MODERATE SEDATION; CHILDREN; ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; ENDOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare propofol and fentanyl to induce conscious sedation in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Study design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Pediatric Pulmonology division at a tertiary care center in Delhi, India. Participants Children aged 3-15 years who underwent flexible bronchoscopy. Intervention Children received either intravenous propofol 1 mg/kg administered as a slow bolus over 1 minute followed by 2 mg/kg/hour infusion, or intravenous Fentanyl 2 mu g/kg administered as a slow bolus over one minute. Outcomes Primary outcome was time to achieve conscious sedation (Ramsay score 3). Secondary outcomes were need for adjuvant midazolam, physician satisfaction, level of cough, recovery features, and side-effects in the groups. Results 53 children (propofol 27, fentanyl 26) were enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) time taken to achieve Ramsay score 03 was lower in propofol than fentanyl [15.7 (4.4) s vs 206 (55) s, P<0.001]. Propofol arm had significantly higher physician satisfaction, less requirement of adjuvant midazolam, less coughing and faster regain of full consciousness. There was no difference in drug side-effects between the groups. Conclusion Propofol has a shorter sedation induction time, less coughing during procedure, less recovery time, and better physician satisfaction compared to fentanyl for flexible bronchoscopy in children.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1016
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl
    Correia, Lucianna Motta
    Bonilha, Danielle Queiroz
    Gomes, Gustavo Flores
    Brito, Juliana Ramos
    Nakao, Frank Shigueo
    Lenz, Luciano
    Silveira Rohr, Maria Rachel
    Ferrari, Angelo P.
    Della Libera, Ermelindo
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [22] Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Agostoni, M.
    Fanti, L.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Gemma, M.
    Strini, G.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (11) : 1024 - 1029
  • [23] Feasibility of Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Infusion for Flexible Bronchoscopy Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lo, Yu-Lun
    Lin, Ting-Yu
    Fang, Yueh-Fu
    Wang, Tsai-Yu
    Chen, Hao-Cheng
    Chou, Chun-Liang
    Chung, Fu-Tsai
    Kuo, Chih-Hsi
    Feng, Po-Hao
    Liu, Chien-Ying
    Kuo, Han-Pin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [24] Randomized controlled trial for intermittent versus continuous propofol sedation for pediatric brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging studies
    Hassan, Nabil E.
    Betz, Bradford W.
    Cole, Morgan R.
    Wincek, Jeni
    Reischman, Diann
    Sanfilippo, Dominic J.
    Winterhalter-Rzeszutko, Kim M.
    Kopec, John S.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (06) : E262 - E265
  • [25] Sedation with etomidate-fentanyl versus propofol-fentanyl in colonoscopies: A prospective randomized study
    Banihashem, Nadia
    Alijanpour, Ebrahim
    Basirat, Majid
    Shirvany, Javad Shokri
    Kashifard, Mehrdad
    Taheri, Hasan
    Savadkohi, Shahriyar
    Hosseini, Vahid
    Solimanian, Seyed Sedigheh
    [J]. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 6 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [26] Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil versus Propofol for Rigid Bronchoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pan, Yafei
    Chen, Mo
    Gu, Fulei
    Chen, Jinyan
    Zhang, Wen
    Huang, Zhangxiang
    Zhu, Dapeng
    Song, Jia
    Fang, Jun
    Yu, Weifeng
    Xie, Kangjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [27] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Molina-Infante, Javier
    Duenas-Sadornil, Carmen
    Mateos-Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Perez-Gallardo, Belen
    Vinagre-Rodriguez, Gema
    Hernandez-Alonso, Moises
    Fernandez-Bermejo, Miguel
    Gonzalez-Huix, Ferran
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (09) : 2385 - 2393
  • [28] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Javier Molina-Infante
    Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil
    Jose M. Mateos-Rodriguez
    Belen Perez-Gallardo
    Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez
    Moises Hernandez-Alonso
    Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
    Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 2385 - 2393
  • [29] Subdissociative-dose Ketamine versus Fentanyl for Analgesia during Propofol Procedural Sedation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Messenger, David W.
    Murray, Heather E.
    Dungey, Paul E.
    van Vlymen, Janet
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (10) : 877 - 886
  • [30] A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and butarphanol for sedation during EUS
    Santosh, D.
    Mohan, R.
    Rajesh, G.
    Sandeep, L.
    Reddy, D. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 : A62 - A62