Nestling mouth colour: ecological correlates of a begging signal

被引:82
|
作者
Kilner, R [1 ]
Davies, NB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1998.0785
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The mouths of begging nestlings vary widely in colour, ranging from yellow in robins, Erithacus rubecula, to red in reed buntings, Emberiza schoeniclus. Two functions have been suggested for bright nestling mouth colour: (1) it may improve the detectability of chicks, particularly in poorly lit nests and (2) within species, it may signal need. We tested these hypotheses in a comparative analysis, measuring the mouth colours of nestlings from 31 species under conditions of standardized light availability and food deprivation. Changes in mouth colour signalled need only among the seed-regurgitating finches. In these species there was a 'red flush' at the onset of begging, which became redder with increasing food deprivation. No other species showed these changes, including the closely related chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs, which feeds its young insects. We found no evidence that mouth colour was correlated with the light available in the nest. We did find, however, that nestlings in darker nests improved their conspicuousness through the relative colour and size of the flange that borders their brightly coloured mouths. Nestlings from darker nests had relatively wider flanges, which were whiter and less densely coloured in relation to their mouth colour, than those of chicks reared in better illuminated nests. Clutch size was not related to mouth or flange colour, or relative flange size. We suggest that nestling mouth colour has not been selected to make chicks detectable, but that this is the function of the surrounding flange. We also discuss reasons why signals of need through mouth colour are not more widespread. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 712
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging
    Mutzel, Ariane
    Olsen, Anne-Lise
    Mathot, Kimberley J.
    Araya-Ajoy, Yimen G.
    Nicolaus, Marion
    Wijmenga, Jan J.
    Wright, Jonathan
    Kempenaers, Bart
    Dingemanse, Niels J.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 30 (04) : 1123 - 1135
  • [42] Ecological and behavioural correlates of colour polymorphism in a lacertid lizard, Podarcis melisellensis
    Huyghe, K
    Vanhooydonck, B
    Herrel, A
    Van Damme, R
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (06) : 1017 - 1017
  • [43] Does begging affect growth in nestling tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor?
    Leonard, ML
    Horn, AG
    Porter, J
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2003, 54 (06) : 573 - 577
  • [44] Multimodal begging signals reflect independent indices of nestling condition in European starlings
    Jacob, Staffan
    Rieucau, Guillaume
    Heeb, Philipp
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 22 (06) : 1249 - 1255
  • [45] Thermal imaging of house sparrow nestlings: The effect of begging behavior and nestling rank
    Ovadia, O
    Pinshow, B
    Lotem, A
    CONDOR, 2002, 104 (04): : 837 - 842
  • [46] Protective coloration of the inside of the mouth in nestling birds
    Butterfield, WR
    NATURE, 1905, 72 : 534 - 534
  • [47] Begging signals and biparental care:: nestling choice between parental feeding locations
    Kölliker, M
    Richner, H
    Werner, I
    Heeb, P
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 55 : 215 - 222
  • [48] Ectoparasites, nestling growth, parental feeding rates, and begging intensity of tree swallows
    Thomas, K
    Shutler, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2001, 79 (02): : 346 - 353
  • [49] Does ambient noise affect growth and begging call structure in nestling birds?
    Leonard, Marty L.
    Horn, Andrew G.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) : 502 - 507
  • [50] Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing
    McDonald, Paul G.
    Wilson, David R.
    Evans, Christopher S.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) : 821 - 829