Standardized Expression of 18F-NAV4694 and 11C-PiB β-Amyloid PET Results with the Centiloid Scale

被引:79
|
作者
Rowe, Christopher C. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Gareth [1 ]
Dore, Vincent [1 ,3 ]
Pejoska, Svetlana [1 ]
Margison, Laura [1 ]
Mulligan, Rachel S. [1 ]
Chan, J. Gordon [1 ]
Young, Kenneth [1 ]
Villemagne, Victor L. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Dept Mol Imaging, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] CSIRO Hlth & Biosecur, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Florey Inst Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; centiloid; amyloid imaging; beta-amyloid; standardization; PITTSBURGH COMPOUND-B; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; QUANTIFICATION; RADIOLIGAND; BRAIN; F-18-AZD4694; VARIABILITY; DEPOSITION; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.115.171595
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A common quantitative output value for PET measures of beta-amyloid (A beta) binding across tracers and methods would allow better comparison of data across sites and application of universal diagnostic and prognostic values. A method has recently been developed that generates a unit of measurement called the centiloid. We applied this method to 2-[2-F-18-fluoro-6-(methylamino)-3-pyridinyl]-1-benzofuran-5-ol (F-18-NAV4694) and C-11-Pittsburgh compound B (C-11-PiB) A beta images to derive the scaling factor required to express tracer binding in centiloids. Methods: Fifty-five participants, including 10 young controls (33 +/- 7 y old), underwent both C-11-PiB and F-18-NAV4694 imaging no more than 3 mo apart, with the images acquired 50-70 min after tracer injection. The images were spatially normalized and analyzed using the standard centiloid method and regions (cortex and whole-cerebellum reference) downloaded from the Global Alzheimer Association Interactive Network website. Results: SUV ratios (SUVRs) showed a strong correlation in tracer binding (F-18-NAV4694 SUVR = 1.09 x C-11-PiB SUVR - 0.08, R-2 = 0.99). The equation to convert F-18-NAV4694 to centiloids [100 x (F-18-NAV4694 SUVR - 1.028)/1.174] was similar to a published equation for C-11-PiB [100 x (C-11-PiB SUVR - 1.009)/1.067]. In the young controls, the variance ratio (F-18-NAV4694 centiloid SD divided by C-11-PiB centiloid SD) was 0.85. Conclusion: The results for both C-11-PiB and F-18-NAV4694 can now be expressed in centiloids, an important step that should allow better clinical and research use of A beta imaging. The standard centiloid method also showed that F-18-NAV4694 has slightly higher A beta binding and lower variance than C-11-PiB, important properties for detecting early A beta deposition and change over time.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1237
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of functional parameter between 18F-FDG and 11C-PIB PET for dual assessment
    Kim, Su Jin
    Kim, Yu Kyeong
    Lee, Jae Sung
    Yoon, Eun Jin
    Kim, Sang Eun
    Lee, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51
  • [22] The correlation of neuropsychological evaluation with 11C-PiB and 18F-FC119S amyloid PET in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease
    Park, Su Yeon
    Byun, Byung Hyun
    Kim, Byung Il
    Lim, Sang Moo
    Ko, In Ok
    Lee, Kyo Chul
    Kim, Kyeong Min
    Kim, Yu Kyeong
    Lee, Jun-Young
    Bu, Seon Hee
    Kim, Jung Hwa
    Chi, Dae Yoon
    Ha, Jeong Ho
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (16) : E19620
  • [23] Comparison of 22 partial volume correction methods for amyloid PET imaging with 11C-PiB
    Yamao, Tensho
    Miwa, Kenta
    Wagatsuma, Kei
    Matsubara, Keisuke
    Nemoto, Reo
    Kamitaka, Yuto
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59
  • [24] Feasibility of radiomics for differentiation of HC and AD using 18F-FDG and 11C-PIB PET scans
    Peretti, D.
    Kolinger, G.
    Pfaehler, E.
    Reesink, F.
    de Jong, B.
    De Deyn, P.
    Dierckx, R.
    Garcia, D. Vallez
    Boellaard, R.
    JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 2022, 42 (1_SUPPL): : 194 - 195
  • [25] Visualization of multiple organ amyloid involvement in systemic amyloidosis using 11C-PiB PET imaging
    Ezawa, Naoki
    Katoh, Nagaaki
    Oguchi, Kazuhiro
    Yoshinaga, Tsuneaki
    Yazaki, Masahide
    Sekijima, Yoshiki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (03) : 452 - 461
  • [26] Amyloid brain deposition in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus assessed by 11C-PIB PET/CT
    Jimenez-Bonilla, J. F.
    Quirce, R.
    De Arcocha-Torres, M.
    Martinez-Rodriguez, I.
    Carril, J. M.
    Jimenez-Alonso, M.
    Banzo, I.
    Pozueta, A.
    Martin-Laez, R.
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S134 - S134
  • [27] The relationship between amyloid load, microglial activation, and cognition in Alzheimer's disease:: An 11C-PIB, 11C-PK11195, and 18F-FDG PET study
    Edison, P
    Archer, H
    Hinz, R
    Gerhard, A
    Hammers, A
    Pavese, N
    Tai, YF
    Hotton, G
    Cuttler, D
    Fox, N
    Rossor, M
    Brooks, DJ
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (06) : A390 - A391
  • [28] The association of 11C-PIB uptake and cerebral glucose metabolism on 18F-FDG PET in Alzheimer's disease
    Lee, Jeong Won
    Kim, Yu Kyeong
    Kim, Su Jin
    Kim, Sang Eun
    Lee, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50
  • [29] Visual assessment versus quantitative assessment of 11C-PIB PET and 18F-FDG PET for detection of Alzheimer's disease
    Ng, Steven
    Villemagne, Victor L.
    Berlangieri, Sam
    Lee, Sze-Ting
    Cherk, Martin
    Gong, Sylvia J.
    Ackermann, Uwe
    Saunder, Tim
    Tochon-Danguy, Henri
    Jones, Gareth
    Smith, Clare
    O'Keefe, Graeme
    Masters, Colin L.
    Rowe, Christopher C.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (04) : 547 - 552
  • [30] Detection of meningioma in a patient with mild cognitive impairment assessed by 11C-PIB and 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Jimenez-Bonilla, J. F.
    Quirce, R.
    De Arcocha-Torres, M.
    Martinez-Rodriguez, I.
    Martinez-Amador, N.
    Banzo, I.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2020, 39 (02): : 106 - 107