Performance of Field-Collected Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Strains Exposed to Different Transgenic and Refuge Maize Hybrids in Argentina

被引:15
|
作者
Murua, Maria G. [1 ]
Vera, Martin A. [2 ]
Michel, Andrew [3 ]
Casmuz, Augusto S. [2 ]
Fatoretto, Julio [4 ]
Gastaminza, Gerardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, EEAOC, ITANOA, Ave William Cross 3150,Las Talitas 4001, RA-4001 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[2] EEAOC, Ave William Cross 3150,Las Talitas 4001, RA-4001 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[3] Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Entomol, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[4] Syngenta Crop Protect, Ave Nacoes Unidas 18001, BR-04795900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
fall armyworm; Cry1F; resistant strain; larval duration; asynchronous emergence; BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS; EVOLVED RESISTANCE; CRY1F RESISTANCE; FALL ARMYWORM; BT MAIZE; FITNESS COSTS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/jisesa/iez110
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) is one of the major pests of maize in Argentina. The main tool for its control is the use of genetically modified maize hybrids expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal proteins. Maize growers in Argentina initially controlled this pest with Bt maize that expressed a single Bt protein (Cry1Ab or Cry1F). Currently it is necessary to plant maize cultivars that produce two Bt proteins to achieve the satisfactory control. Recently, Cry1F field-evolved resistant populations of this species were confirmed in Argentina. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of S. frugiperda field-collected strains on different Bt and non-Bt maize hybrids. Strains were collected from non-Bt maize (T1), Agrisure TDMax (T2), Agrisure Viptera (T3), Agrisure Viptera 3110 (T4), Genuity VT Triple Pro (T5), and Power Core (T6).Three experiments were performed to 1) determine the survivorship and reproduction of field-collected larvae (F-0) from Bt maize hybrids, 2) evaluate Cry1F resistance using an F-1 screen, and 3) assess the performance of F-1 strains on different maize hybrids. In the F-0, the survivorship from larva to adult ranged from 0 to 63%. We obtained adults from only the T1, T2, T5, and T6 strains with no significant differences in the reproductive parameters. Continuously rearing F-1 larvae on their collected hosts affected larval duration, which was significantly shorter for a known-laboratory Bt-susceptible strain than the field-collected strains. Our results support the existence of Cry1F-resistance alleles in S. frugiperda field populations in Argentina.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of key parameters for developing a Metarhizium rileyi-based biopesticide against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize: laboratory, greenhouse, and field trials
    Faria, Marcos
    Souza, Daniela Aguiar
    Sanches, Marcio Martinello
    Vergolino Schmidt, Francisco Guilherme
    Oliveira, Charles Martins
    Benito, Norton Polo
    Lopes, Rogerio Biaggioni
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 78 (03) : 1146 - 1154
  • [42] DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN-POLLINATED VARIETIES, NON-CONVENTIONAL HYBRIDS AND INBRED LINES OF TROPICAL MAIZE WITH RESISTANCE TO FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA-FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE), AT CIMMYT
    MIHM, JA
    SMITH, ME
    DEUTSCH, JA
    FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 1988, 71 (03) : 262 - 268
  • [43] Bacillus thuringiensis-Based Bioproduct: Characterization and Performance Against Spodoptera frugiperda Strains in Maize Under Different Environmental Temperatures
    Carrizo, Alfonso Emanuel
    del Valle Loto, Flavia
    Baigori, Mario Domingo
    Pera, Licia Maria
    NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2023, 52 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [44] Gut bacteria of field-collected larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda undergo selection and are more diverse and active in metabolizing multiple insecticides than laboratory-selected resistant strains
    Freitas Gomes, Ana Flavia
    Omoto, Celso
    Consoli, Fernando Luis
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2020, 93 (02) : 833 - 851
  • [45] Bacillus thuringiensis-Based Bioproduct: Characterization and Performance Against Spodoptera frugiperda Strains in Maize Under Different Environmental Temperatures
    Alfonso Emanuel Carrizo
    Flavia del Valle Loto
    Mario Domingo Baigorí
    Licia María Pera
    Neotropical Entomology, 2023, 52 : 283 - 291
  • [46] Gut bacteria of field-collected larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda undergo selection and are more diverse and active in metabolizing multiple insecticides than laboratory-selected resistant strains
    Ana Flávia Freitas Gomes
    Celso Omoto
    Fernando Luis Cônsoli
    Journal of Pest Science, 2020, 93 : 833 - 851
  • [47] Study of sexual behaviour and characterization of female sex pheromone of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) collected from different locations of Tamil Nadu, India
    Muthukumar, Muthamilselvan
    Ashok, Karuppannasamy
    Kennedy, John Samuel
    JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2023, 26 (04)
  • [48] The use of interval censored data to assess the timing of early field infestation of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in maize fields
    Guimapi, Ritter A.
    Nordskog, Berit
    Hjelkrem, Anne-Grete Roer
    Klingen, Ingeborg
    Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T.
    Tamo, Manuele
    Thunes, Karl H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2024, 184
  • [49] F2 screen, inheritance and cross-resistance of field-derived Vip3A resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) collected from Louisiana, USA
    Yang, Fei
    Morsello, Shannon
    Head, Graham P.
    Sansone, Chris
    Huang, Fangneng
    Gilreath, Ryan T.
    Kerns, David L.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (08) : 1769 - 1778
  • [50] F2 screen for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2-maize in field populations of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from the southern United States
    Niu, Ying
    Qureshi, Jawwad A.
    Ni, Xinzhi
    Head, Graham P.
    Price, Paula A.
    Meagher, Robert L., Jr.
    Kerns, David
    Levy, Ronnie
    Yang, Xiangbing
    Huang, Fangneng
    JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY, 2016, 138 : 66 - 72